Follow:
- Next story [12/22, 22:47] Gp jeyaprakesh Ad: Sir, DMK never moved any petition challenging the rejection order. Two PIL WPs moved forbearing the state from granting any permission for conducting rally by DMK and other parties on 23/12/2019. Their Lordships S.Vaidyanathan & P.T.Asha Admitted and ordered notice to state and other respondents including DMK, Congress etc., Political parties. Their Lordships recorded the rejection order passed by commissioner of police. Further directed to take stern action if any illegal rally, agitations conducted by anybody. Entire such incidents should be videographed by the police by using drons technology. It will help the police to find out the culprits. The court never permitted any rally or agitations as sought by DMK. V.Jayaprakash, GP [12/22, 22:47] Sekarreporter 1: 👍👍
- Previous story [12/22, 19:35] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1208750364255649794?s=08 [12/22, 19:35] Sekarreporter 1: Justices S. Vaidyanathan & PT Asha of Madras HC to hold a special sitting at 8 pm today to hear a plea to restrain DMK & it’s allies from holding a rally in Chennai tomorrow against Citizenship Amendment Act
Recent Posts
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
- கிறிஸ்துவ மத போதகர் ஜாமீன் கோரி
More
Recent Posts
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
- கிறிஸ்துவ மத போதகர் ஜாமீன் கோரி
