![[8/20, 15:08] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1296380928122478594?s=08 [8/20, 15:08] Sekarreporter 1: #BREAKING || சித்த மருத்துவத்தை மத்திய அரசு மாற்றான் தாய் மனப்பான்மையுடன் நடத்துவதாக சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் அதிருப்தி #SunNews | #ChennaiHighCourt | #CentralGovt https://t.co/dVSe63thoi](http://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Arl sundaresan senior advt interview https://youtu.be/6j9lmDvPQLU
- Previous story Mhc advts agitation advts opinion
Recent Posts
- [02/12, 19:25] Sekarreporter: 36 WP/45344/2025 (Green Bench) A.S. REVATHI, AND 5 OTHERS. VS ARAPPOR IYAKKAM, AND 6 OTHERS. M/S.KAMALESH KANNAN VENKATESH.S. MD ARSHADULLAH SHERIFF [02/12, 19:25] Sekarreporter: 39 WP/33506/2025 (PIL) PARTHA SARATHY BOOPATHY VS THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU AND 5 OTHERS. M/S. R.SRIPRIYA J.JESUDASS VAISHNAVI.R —————— M/S.RA.GOPINATH FOR R2 DT.12/09/2025 R-4 THE TAHSILDAR AVADI TALUK OFFICE, AVADI, CHENNAI-600 054 TAPAL DUE REG RR3 AND 6 NO APP NOT READY [02/12, 19:25] Sekarreporter: 40 WP/36311/2025 (PIL) R.KUMARESAN VS THE STATE OF TAMILNADU AND 13 OTHERS. M/S. C.SAMIVEL VIJAY P AARTHI A —————— MR.T.K. SARAVANAN AGP FOR RR1 TO 10 M/S.T.K.SARAVANAN, M.VIRUTHAGIRI FOR R11 DT.26/09/2025 M/S.RICHARDSON WILSON FOR R13 DT.23/10/2025 [02/12, 19:25] Sekarreporter: 03/MSRJ+RSVJ/8 WA/2634/2025 (Labour) UZHAIPPOR URIMAI IYAKKAM VS THE COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER. S. KUMARASWAMY K.SURESH M.K.NIVETHA J.MOHAN RAJ A.KANNAN S.THIRUMURUGAN [02/12, 19:25] Sekarreporter: 42/PBBJ/6 WP/30183/2025 (Endowments) DHARMAPURAM ADHEENAM BY ITS VS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 4 OTHERS. MR. S. GIRISSH M.MADHU —————— MR. S. RAVEEKUMAR LEARNED GP (PONDY) FOR R1 AND R2. M/S. T.M. NAVEEN, K.DHANUSH KUMAR, K.B.SHRINIVAAS, V.R.ADHITH FOR R3 & R4 DT.01/09/2025 M/S. GOVT. PLEADER FOR PUDUCHERRY FOR R5 MEMO DT. 17/11/2025
- *Court Name:* Supreme Court of India *Judge Name:* Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K.V. Viswanathan *Parties Name:* Jyoti Builders vs. Chief Executive Officer & Ors. *Date of Order:* 2 December 2025 *Counsel Name:* – Petitioner: Mr. Parameshwar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Palash Singhai, AOR, Mr. Harshal Sareen, Adv., Mr. Pragya Prakash Upadhyaya, Adv. – Respondents: Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv., Mr. Kavin Gulati, Sr. Adv., Mr. Anish Agarwal, AOR, and others *Court Observation:* The Supreme Court held that the power of the State Government to acquire land under Section 14 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, is subject to the preferential right of the owner. The court emphasized that the landowner has a statutory preferential right to redevelop slum-affected property, and this right must be respected before the State exercises its acquisition powers. The court also directed that no construction shall be made on the subject property, and it shall be utilized only as a Recreational Ground (RG). ¹
- [02/12, 18:52] Sekarreporter: Here’s the head note: Court Name: Supreme Court of India Judge Name: Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi Parties Name: Suo Motu Case (Digital Arrest Scams) Date of Order: Not specified Counsel Name: Not specified Court Observation: The bench directed the CBI to investigate digital arrest scams, prioritizing cases with direct reports, and noted the scams demand immediate attention from the nation’s premier investigating agency. [02/12, 18:52] Sekarreporter: 👍
- Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi passed the order in the suo motu case taken by it on the issue of digital arrest. The bench said the scams demand the “immediate attention” of the nation’s premier investigating agency. The court directed that the CBI shall first investigate cases directly reporting digital arrest scams, while other forms of cybercrime may be taken up in subsequent phases.
- [02/12, 18:41] Sekarreporter: [02/12, 10:50] Sekarreporter: 22 WP/44308/2025 (Endowments) SRI.T.R.RAMESH, VS GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ANOTHER. M/S.ABINAV PARTHASARATHY D.G.HARIPRASATH S.H.SYED ANWAR T.E.KRISHNA R.SHRICHARAN [02/12, 10:50] Sekarreporter: Judge name [02/12, 18:41] Sekarreporter: Justice P B Balaji [02/12, 18:41] Sekarreporter: Matter did not reach today Sir
More
Recent Posts
- [02/12, 19:25] Sekarreporter: 36 WP/45344/2025 (Green Bench) A.S. REVATHI, AND 5 OTHERS. VS ARAPPOR IYAKKAM, AND 6 OTHERS. M/S.KAMALESH KANNAN VENKATESH.S. MD ARSHADULLAH SHERIFF [02/12, 19:25] Sekarreporter: 39 WP/33506/2025 (PIL) PARTHA SARATHY BOOPATHY VS THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU AND 5 OTHERS. M/S. R.SRIPRIYA J.JESUDASS VAISHNAVI.R —————— M/S.RA.GOPINATH FOR R2 DT.12/09/2025 R-4 THE TAHSILDAR AVADI TALUK OFFICE, AVADI, CHENNAI-600 054 TAPAL DUE REG RR3 AND 6 NO APP NOT READY [02/12, 19:25] Sekarreporter: 40 WP/36311/2025 (PIL) R.KUMARESAN VS THE STATE OF TAMILNADU AND 13 OTHERS. M/S. C.SAMIVEL VIJAY P AARTHI A —————— MR.T.K. SARAVANAN AGP FOR RR1 TO 10 M/S.T.K.SARAVANAN, M.VIRUTHAGIRI FOR R11 DT.26/09/2025 M/S.RICHARDSON WILSON FOR R13 DT.23/10/2025 [02/12, 19:25] Sekarreporter: 03/MSRJ+RSVJ/8 WA/2634/2025 (Labour) UZHAIPPOR URIMAI IYAKKAM VS THE COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER. S. KUMARASWAMY K.SURESH M.K.NIVETHA J.MOHAN RAJ A.KANNAN S.THIRUMURUGAN [02/12, 19:25] Sekarreporter: 42/PBBJ/6 WP/30183/2025 (Endowments) DHARMAPURAM ADHEENAM BY ITS VS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 4 OTHERS. MR. S. GIRISSH M.MADHU —————— MR. S. RAVEEKUMAR LEARNED GP (PONDY) FOR R1 AND R2. M/S. T.M. NAVEEN, K.DHANUSH KUMAR, K.B.SHRINIVAAS, V.R.ADHITH FOR R3 & R4 DT.01/09/2025 M/S. GOVT. PLEADER FOR PUDUCHERRY FOR R5 MEMO DT. 17/11/2025
- *Court Name:* Supreme Court of India *Judge Name:* Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K.V. Viswanathan *Parties Name:* Jyoti Builders vs. Chief Executive Officer & Ors. *Date of Order:* 2 December 2025 *Counsel Name:* – Petitioner: Mr. Parameshwar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Palash Singhai, AOR, Mr. Harshal Sareen, Adv., Mr. Pragya Prakash Upadhyaya, Adv. – Respondents: Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv., Mr. Kavin Gulati, Sr. Adv., Mr. Anish Agarwal, AOR, and others *Court Observation:* The Supreme Court held that the power of the State Government to acquire land under Section 14 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, is subject to the preferential right of the owner. The court emphasized that the landowner has a statutory preferential right to redevelop slum-affected property, and this right must be respected before the State exercises its acquisition powers. The court also directed that no construction shall be made on the subject property, and it shall be utilized only as a Recreational Ground (RG). ¹
- [02/12, 18:52] Sekarreporter: Here’s the head note: Court Name: Supreme Court of India Judge Name: Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi Parties Name: Suo Motu Case (Digital Arrest Scams) Date of Order: Not specified Counsel Name: Not specified Court Observation: The bench directed the CBI to investigate digital arrest scams, prioritizing cases with direct reports, and noted the scams demand immediate attention from the nation’s premier investigating agency. [02/12, 18:52] Sekarreporter: 👍
- Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi passed the order in the suo motu case taken by it on the issue of digital arrest. The bench said the scams demand the “immediate attention” of the nation’s premier investigating agency. The court directed that the CBI shall first investigate cases directly reporting digital arrest scams, while other forms of cybercrime may be taken up in subsequent phases.
- [02/12, 18:41] Sekarreporter: [02/12, 10:50] Sekarreporter: 22 WP/44308/2025 (Endowments) SRI.T.R.RAMESH, VS GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ANOTHER. M/S.ABINAV PARTHASARATHY D.G.HARIPRASATH S.H.SYED ANWAR T.E.KRISHNA R.SHRICHARAN [02/12, 10:50] Sekarreporter: Judge name [02/12, 18:41] Sekarreporter: Justice P B Balaji [02/12, 18:41] Sekarreporter: Matter did not reach today Sir