Follow:
- Next story Lita Srinivasan Two: Para 24 of the aforesaid judgement filed by a trust is extracted here under :
- Previous story mhc advt: How can a trust file for defamation ? It has no soul or mind to get injured.It is not an entity.
Recent Posts
- S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. and C.SARAVANAN,J. ar 4. In our previous order dated 25.08.2023, we had clearly held that the order has to be complied with in letter and spirit, as otherwise, they have to cast their appearance before this Court on the next date of hearing. Moreover, a Statutory Notice was also issued to the respondents as early as on 06.04.2023. Though the presence of the respondents / contemnors had been dispensed with on 01.06.2023, it does not mean that this Court has given license to disobey the order of this Court. The respondents, namely, Mrs.Swarna I.A.S., and Mrs.Mythili K.Rajendran I.A.S. have neither chosen to comply with the order of this Court nor to appear before this Court and the act of the respondents is highly deprecated, thereby making a mockery of the Court and the judicial system. Hence, we are inclined to issue a Bailable Warrant to the respondents to secure their presence. Registry is directed to issue a Bailable Warrant to Mrs.Swarna I.A.S., and Mrs.Mythili K.Rajendran I.A.S / Contemnors, returnable by 04.10.2023. Post on 04.10.2023. (S.V.N.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.) 20.09.2023 ar Note: Issue order copy AND WARRANT on 21.09.2023 Cont.P.No.563 of 2022
- Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) SCC 493 : Extra judicial executive victim families assn vs union of india : Regarding fake encounters custodial deaths , writ is maintainable even though alternative remedy before NHRC was available
- TN Advocate General R Shunmugasundaram has rejected an application filed by Savukku Shankar seeking consent to initiate criminal contempt of court proceedings against DMK organisation secretary R.S. Bharathi. Says, criticism cannot be contempt @THChennai
- sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1705150039197413765?t=VAmzvah803mY-aLNXsgmeQ&s=08 [9/22, 14:53] sekarreporter1: காவல்துறை சார்பில் மாநகர சிறப்பு வழக்கறிஞர் எம்.சுதாகர் ஆஜராகி, பரபரப்பாக வாதாடினார் .
- 9/22, 14:53] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1705150039197413765?t=VAmzvah803mY-aLNXsgmeQ&s=08 [9/22, 14:53] sekarreporter1: காவல்துறை சார்பில் மாநகர சிறப்பு வழக்கறிஞர் எம்.சுதாகர் ஆஜராகி, பரபரப்பாக வாதாடினார் . சுதாகர் வாதாடும் போது,,மணியனுக்கு ஜாமீன் வழங்க கூடாது என எதிர்ப்பு தெரிவித்தார்.
More
Recent Posts
- S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. and C.SARAVANAN,J. ar 4. In our previous order dated 25.08.2023, we had clearly held that the order has to be complied with in letter and spirit, as otherwise, they have to cast their appearance before this Court on the next date of hearing. Moreover, a Statutory Notice was also issued to the respondents as early as on 06.04.2023. Though the presence of the respondents / contemnors had been dispensed with on 01.06.2023, it does not mean that this Court has given license to disobey the order of this Court. The respondents, namely, Mrs.Swarna I.A.S., and Mrs.Mythili K.Rajendran I.A.S. have neither chosen to comply with the order of this Court nor to appear before this Court and the act of the respondents is highly deprecated, thereby making a mockery of the Court and the judicial system. Hence, we are inclined to issue a Bailable Warrant to the respondents to secure their presence. Registry is directed to issue a Bailable Warrant to Mrs.Swarna I.A.S., and Mrs.Mythili K.Rajendran I.A.S / Contemnors, returnable by 04.10.2023. Post on 04.10.2023. (S.V.N.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.) 20.09.2023 ar Note: Issue order copy AND WARRANT on 21.09.2023 Cont.P.No.563 of 2022
- Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) SCC 493 : Extra judicial executive victim families assn vs union of india : Regarding fake encounters custodial deaths , writ is maintainable even though alternative remedy before NHRC was available
- TN Advocate General R Shunmugasundaram has rejected an application filed by Savukku Shankar seeking consent to initiate criminal contempt of court proceedings against DMK organisation secretary R.S. Bharathi. Says, criticism cannot be contempt @THChennai
- sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1705150039197413765?t=VAmzvah803mY-aLNXsgmeQ&s=08 [9/22, 14:53] sekarreporter1: காவல்துறை சார்பில் மாநகர சிறப்பு வழக்கறிஞர் எம்.சுதாகர் ஆஜராகி, பரபரப்பாக வாதாடினார் .
- 9/22, 14:53] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1705150039197413765?t=VAmzvah803mY-aLNXsgmeQ&s=08 [9/22, 14:53] sekarreporter1: காவல்துறை சார்பில் மாநகர சிறப்பு வழக்கறிஞர் எம்.சுதாகர் ஆஜராகி, பரபரப்பாக வாதாடினார் . சுதாகர் வாதாடும் போது,,மணியனுக்கு ஜாமீன் வழங்க கூடாது என எதிர்ப்பு தெரிவித்தார்.