SC rejects telecom companies’ plea: by Sekar Reporter · January 16, 2020 [1/16, 19:09] Sekarreporter 1: SC rejects telecom companies’ plea: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-rejects-telecom-companies-plea/article30577068.ece [1/16, 19:09] Sekarreporter 1: They wanted a review of order upholding recovery by the government of past dues. A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court led by Justice Arun Mishra, on Thursday, dismissed petitions filed by telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea, for a review of its October 2019 judgment upholding the recovery of past dues amounting to ₹1.47 lakh crore from them. The recovery by the government was based on adjusted gross revenue of about ₹92,000 crore. The review petitions were rejected by the Bench, also comprising Justices Abdul S. Nazeer and M.R. Shah, in their chambers. [1/16, 19:10] Sekarreporter 1: The Bench found no merit in the review petitions and rejected a plea for an open court hearing. “Applications for hearing in open Court/oral hearing are rejected. Having perused the Review Petitions and the connected papers with meticulous care, we do not find any justifiable reason to entertain the review petitions. The Review Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of,” the Supreme Court observed in a short order. On October 24 last year, the Supreme Court dealt a huge blow to telecom service providers when it upheld the Department of Telecom’s (DoT) move to recover adjusted gross revenue (AGR) of about ₹92,000 crore from them. The Bench had said the telecom sector had long reaped the fruits of the Centre’s liberalised mode of payment by revenue sharing regime. “The sector has benefited immensely under the scheme, as is apparent from the gross revenue trend from 2004 to 2015,” Justice Mishra had written, adding the service providers, in turn, failed to fulfil their obligations to the government and instead raised frivolous objections. “The telecom service providers, in spite of the financial benefits of the package, started to ensure that they do not pay the licence fee to the public exchequer based on an agreed AGR,” the Supreme Court had observed in a 153-page judgment. The court had dismissed the telecom service providers’ objection to the government’s formulation of AGR. The judgment had said the gross revenue would be inclusive of installation charges, late fees, sale proceeds of handsets (or any other terminal equipment etc.), revenue on account of interest, dividend, value-added services, supplementary services, access or interconnection charges, roaming charges, revenue from permissible sharing of infrastructure and any other miscellaneous revenue, without any set-off for related item of expense.
மின்னணு சாட்சியங்களை கையாள்வது தொடர்பாக எடுக்கப்பட்ட நடவடிக்கைகளுக்காக தமிழக டிஜிபி மற்றும் சென்னை மாநகர காவல் ஆணையருக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் பாராட்டு தெரிவித்துள்ளது. pp hasan mohamad jinna. நீதிபதி எம்.எஸ். ரமேஷ் மற்றும் ஆனந்த் வெங்கடேஷ் July 22, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published July 22, 2023
The Hon’ble High Court is scheduled to have inauguration of Virtual Court on 26.05.2020 at 4.30 P.M. The Virtual Court will be inaugurated by the Hon’ble Dr. Justice D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, Judge, Supreme Court of India and Chairman, E-Committee, May 25, 2020 by Sekar Reporter · Published May 25, 2020
: W.P.No.21154 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Date : 24.02.2021 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.21154 of 2011 S.Meena … Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director General of Police Dr Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai – 4. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District. … Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion as Inspector of Police by including her name in the C list of Sub-Inspector of Police fit for promotion as June 5, 2021 by Sekar Reporter · Published June 5, 2021