SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Uncategorized

In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. The FIR in Crime No.39 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District, registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B IPC, corresponding to Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 61(2) BNS, 2023, is quashed as against the petitioners. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. The interim stay already granted stands made absolute. 30.04.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Sml To 1. The Inspector of Police, DCB, Madurai District. 2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.  L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 27.02.2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 30.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.21195 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.418 of 2026 1. L. Jaisankar 2. Manimegalai...

Uncategorized

Judge Victoria Gowri refused to quash because: prosecution has more than just co-accused statement, conscious possession is disputed fact for trial, prima facie case exists, and it doesn’t meet SC’s _Bhajan Lal_ criteria for quashing. So case must go to trial.

*Justice L. Victoria Gowri | Madras HC – Madurai Bench* *Order refusing to quash proceedings* | Crl.O.P.(MD) context — *What the Court Held* When deciding a petition to quash criminal case, the judge laid...

Uncategorized

Judge victoriya gowri This Court finds: (a) prosecution is not shown to rest solely on co-accused confession; (b) disputed questions of conscious possession arise; (c) prima facie materials exist requiring trial; (d) case does not fall within State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal20 categories.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 27.02.2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 30.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.19064 of 2025 P.Surya … Petitioner/ Accused No.10 Vs. 1. The State...

Uncategorized

Madras HC | Madurai Bench | Justice Krishnan Ramasamy* *Case*: _Kathiravan v. Commissioner of State Tax_ | W.P.(MD)No.2286 of 2026 | 16.02.2026

[03/05, 07:52] sekarreporter1: https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/madras-hc-sets-aside-gst-demand-holds-personal-hearing-mandatory-before-passing-assessment-order-us-74-1443498 [03/05, 07:52] Meta AI: *Madras HC | Madurai Bench | Justice Krishnan Ramasamy* *Case*: _Kathiravan v. Commissioner of State Tax_ | W.P.(MD)No.2286 of 2026 | 16.02.2026 — *1. What Happened*...

Duty of courts* When a prosecution is based on _“misunderstanding amplified into accusation”_ rather than a real offence, the High Court _must_ intervene under Sec 482 CrPC. Judicial intervention isn’t just allowed – it’s *mandatory* to prevent abuse of process.

Uncategorized

Duty of courts* When a prosecution is based on _“misunderstanding amplified into accusation”_ rather than a real offence, the High Court _must_ intervene under Sec 482 CrPC. Judicial intervention isn’t just allowed – it’s *mandatory* to prevent abuse of process.

*Justice L. Victoria Gowri | Madras HC – Madurai Bench* *30.04.2026 | Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 16736 of 2024 | _S. Rajadurai Lingam*_ — *Full context of the quote* > _”prosecution upon exaggerated or misconceived allegations,...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com