SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Criminal Malicious prosecution initiated against veteran director Kastooriraja father of actor Dhanush by financier Gagan Bothra for having roped him in a false case.The case pertain to a loan availed by him in 2012 to the tune of ₹65lakhs from late Cine financier Bothra. To discharge that loan, Kastooriraja issued cheques which got dishonoured and late Bothra had filed 138 case and civil suit before high court. During the pendency of those cases, Kastooriraja filed private complaint alleging that blank cheques given by him were misused by Mukanchand Bothra and his son gagan Bothra and initiated private complaint before Vlll MM George Town court. The said case was subsequently quashed by Justice Dandapani on the ground that Kastooriraja has purposely inorder to harass gagan Bothra has filed a private complaint.Based on that Gagan Bothra insisted private complaint for malicious prosecution and compensation of one crore before the Vllll MM at Georgetown and the learned magistrate took prima facie cognisance and issued summons to the accused Kastooriraja and directed him to appear personally on 15-11-2024.

Uncategorized

Criminal Malicious prosecution initiated against veteran director Kastooriraja father of actor Dhanush by financier Gagan Bothra for having roped him in a false case.The case pertain to a loan availed by him in 2012 to the tune of ₹65lakhs from late Cine financier Bothra. To discharge that loan, Kastooriraja issued cheques which got dishonoured and late Bothra had filed 138 case and civil suit before high court. During the pendency of those cases, Kastooriraja filed private complaint alleging that blank cheques given by him were misused by Mukanchand Bothra and his son gagan Bothra and initiated private complaint before Vlll MM George Town court. The said case was subsequently quashed by Justice Dandapani on the ground that Kastooriraja has purposely inorder to harass gagan Bothra has filed a private complaint.Based on that Gagan Bothra insisted private complaint for malicious prosecution and compensation of one crore before the Vllll MM at Georgetown and the learned magistrate took prima facie cognisance and issued summons to the accused Kastooriraja and directed him to appear personally on 15-11-2024.

Criminal Malicious prosecution initiated against veteran director Kastooriraja father of actor Dhanush by financier Gagan Bothra for having roped him in a false case.The case pertain to a loan availed by him in 2012...

2024:MHC:3519IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON: 16.08.2024DELIVERED ON: 04.10.2024CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMARW. P.No.23894 of 2024W.M.P.Nos.26151, 26152 & 26155 of 2024NLC India Limited,Represented by its Deputy General Manager (HR)/IR, Neyveli – 607 801.…Petitionervs.1.The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner – Central,No.4, Haddows Road, Shastri Bhavan, Chennai – 600 006.2.The Regional Labour Commissioner – Central,No.4, Haddows Road, Shastri Bhavan, Chenai – 600 006.3.The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), DA-2, BSNL Staff Quarters, Jaya Nagar, Reddiarpalayam, Puducherry – 605 010.4.NLC Jeeva Oppantha Thozilalar Sangam,Represented by its General Secretary, D-13, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Block-24, Neyveli – 607 801.5.NLC Jeeva Oppantha Thozilalar Sangam,Represented by its General Secretary,Door No.01, Panruti Main Road,Krishna Maravadi (Near), Abatharanapuram,Vadalur, Kunrinjipadi Taluk, Cuddalore District – 607 303.6.The Collector,Office of the Collectorate, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.7.The Superintendent of Police,No.18, Pudukuppam New Street, Meenakshi Nagar, Pudukuppam, Cuddalore – 607 001.8.The INDOSERVE SOCIETY,Represented by its Administrator, Opposite to TPS – I Expansion, Neyveli, Cuddalore District.9.The Builders Association of India,Represented by its Chairman, D-7, Gnana Sambanthar Salai, Block – 19, Neyveli – 607 803.10.The NLC Contractors Association,Represented by its President,D-23, High School Road,Block No2, Neyveli – 607 803. …RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Declaration to declare the strike by the alleged members/representatives of the 5th respondent is illegal in terms of Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and consequently direct the 5th respondent, its alleged members and the contract workmen of the respondents 8 to 10 from proceeding with the illegal strike and indulging in any mode of agitations either within, or at the Gates, or in the vicinity of the installations of the petitioner company, being a public utility service, which disrupts or has the potential to disrupt the mining and generation activities of the petitioner company or preventing by threats, intimidation or otherwise, free ingress and egress to the willing contract workers and/or workers/executives of the petitioner company, being a public utility service, for attending to their works/shifts/duty or otherwise.For Petitioner : Mr.G.Masilamani, Senior Counsel for Mr.N.NithianandamFor Respondents : Ms.P.J.Anitha for R1 to R3Central Government Standing CounselMr.G.Sankaran, Senior Advocate for R5 for Mr.S.NedunchezhiyanMr.J.Ravindran,Additional Advocate General for R6Assisted by Ms.M.JayanthyMr.V.Meganathan for R7Government Advocate (Criminal Side)Notice to R4, R8-R10 dispensed withO R D E RThe petitioner has filed the present writ petition to declare the strike by the alleged members/representatives of the fifth respondent as illegal in terms of Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and consequently direct the fifth respondent, its alleged members and the contract workmen of respondents 8 to 10 from proceeding with the illegal strike and indulging in any mode of agitations either within, or at the Gates, or in the vicinity of the installations of the petitioner Company, being a Public Utility Service, which disrupts or has the potential to disrupt the mining and generation activities of the petitioner Company or preventing by threats, intimidation or otherwise, free ingress and egress to the willing contract workers and/or workers/executives of the petitioner Company form attending their works/shifts/duty or otherwise.

Uncategorized

2024:MHC:3519IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON: 16.08.2024DELIVERED ON: 04.10.2024CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMARW. P.No.23894 of 2024W.M.P.Nos.26151, 26152 & 26155 of 2024NLC India Limited,Represented by its Deputy General Manager (HR)/IR, Neyveli – 607 801.…Petitionervs.1.The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner – Central,No.4, Haddows Road, Shastri Bhavan, Chennai – 600 006.2.The Regional Labour Commissioner – Central,No.4, Haddows Road, Shastri Bhavan, Chenai – 600 006.3.The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), DA-2, BSNL Staff Quarters, Jaya Nagar, Reddiarpalayam, Puducherry – 605 010.4.NLC Jeeva Oppantha Thozilalar Sangam,Represented by its General Secretary, D-13, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Block-24, Neyveli – 607 801.5.NLC Jeeva Oppantha Thozilalar Sangam,Represented by its General Secretary,Door No.01, Panruti Main Road,Krishna Maravadi (Near), Abatharanapuram,Vadalur, Kunrinjipadi Taluk, Cuddalore District – 607 303.6.The Collector,Office of the Collectorate, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.7.The Superintendent of Police,No.18, Pudukuppam New Street, Meenakshi Nagar, Pudukuppam, Cuddalore – 607 001.8.The INDOSERVE SOCIETY,Represented by its Administrator, Opposite to TPS – I Expansion, Neyveli, Cuddalore District.9.The Builders Association of India,Represented by its Chairman, D-7, Gnana Sambanthar Salai, Block – 19, Neyveli – 607 803.10.The NLC Contractors Association,Represented by its President,D-23, High School Road,Block No2, Neyveli – 607 803. …RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Declaration to declare the strike by the alleged members/representatives of the 5th respondent is illegal in terms of Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and consequently direct the 5th respondent, its alleged members and the contract workmen of the respondents 8 to 10 from proceeding with the illegal strike and indulging in any mode of agitations either within, or at the Gates, or in the vicinity of the installations of the petitioner company, being a public utility service, which disrupts or has the potential to disrupt the mining and generation activities of the petitioner company or preventing by threats, intimidation or otherwise, free ingress and egress to the willing contract workers and/or workers/executives of the petitioner company, being a public utility service, for attending to their works/shifts/duty or otherwise.For Petitioner : Mr.G.Masilamani, Senior Counsel for Mr.N.NithianandamFor Respondents : Ms.P.J.Anitha for R1 to R3Central Government Standing CounselMr.G.Sankaran, Senior Advocate for R5 for Mr.S.NedunchezhiyanMr.J.Ravindran,Additional Advocate General for R6Assisted by Ms.M.JayanthyMr.V.Meganathan for R7Government Advocate (Criminal Side)Notice to R4, R8-R10 dispensed withO R D E RThe petitioner has filed the present writ petition to declare the strike by the alleged members/representatives of the fifth respondent as illegal in terms of Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and consequently direct the fifth respondent, its alleged members and the contract workmen of respondents 8 to 10 from proceeding with the illegal strike and indulging in any mode of agitations either within, or at the Gates, or in the vicinity of the installations of the petitioner Company, being a Public Utility Service, which disrupts or has the potential to disrupt the mining and generation activities of the petitioner Company or preventing by threats, intimidation or otherwise, free ingress and egress to the willing contract workers and/or workers/executives of the petitioner Company form attending their works/shifts/duty or otherwise.

(for short “NLC INDCOSERVE”), had come into existence in 1990. The said INDCOSERVE is a registered Cooperative Society established under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983, consisting of members, who...

Flagpoles case/THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMARW.P. No.30350 of 2024Shyam Kumar … PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government,Revenue Department,Government of Tamilnadu,Secretariat,

Uncategorized

Flagpoles case/THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMARW.P. No.30350 of 2024Shyam Kumar … PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government,Revenue Department,Government of Tamilnadu,Secretariat,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 09.10.2024CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMARW.P. No.30350 of 2024Shyam Kumar … PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government,Revenue Department,Government of Tamilnadu,Secretariat,Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.2.The Secretary to Government,Home Department,Government of...

The Petitioner runs a proprietorship under the name and style CyberX9. They provide cyber security services and have a rich clientele. The Petitioner is also a customer of Star Health insurance Company. Star Health is one of the largest collectors of data of its customers and stores them online through its servers. While doing research on their cyber security, the Petitioner found that there were vulnerabilities in the cyber security of Star Health and the personal data of lot of customers were accessible through the same without the necessity of login and password. The information that was available were the policy details, bank account details, Aadhar card number and other personal information of the customers. The customers include high ranking government officials, politicians, members of the judiciary and other high net worth individuals.

Uncategorized

The Petitioner runs a proprietorship under the name and style CyberX9. They provide cyber security services and have a rich clientele. The Petitioner is also a customer of Star Health insurance Company. Star Health is one of the largest collectors of data of its customers and stores them online through its servers. While doing research on their cyber security, the Petitioner found that there were vulnerabilities in the cyber security of Star Health and the personal data of lot of customers were accessible through the same without the necessity of login and password. The information that was available were the policy details, bank account details, Aadhar card number and other personal information of the customers. The customers include high ranking government officials, politicians, members of the judiciary and other high net worth individuals.

Senior Advocate Srinath Sridevan, representing Pathak, urged the Court to direct the Union government to initiate an investigation into the incident. However, the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information stated that the inquiry should be conducted by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA), not the Central government.

Uncategorized

Senior Advocate Srinath Sridevan, representing Pathak, urged the Court to direct the Union government to initiate an investigation into the incident. However, the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information stated that the inquiry should be conducted by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA), not the Central government.

[14/10, 15:21] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court Petition Calls for Investigation into Star Health Insurance Data Breach https://www.bizzbuzz.news/national/madras-high-court-petition-calls-for-investigation-into-star-health-insurance-data-breach-1339224[14/10, 15:22] sekarreporter1: “ HomeNewsIndustryEconomyMarketsWealthBankingTechBizz TalkPoliticsHomeNational Madras High Court Petition Calls for Investigation into Star Health Insurance Data...

on Monday, Justice M Dhandapani briefly heard the petition filed by cyber security researcher Himanshu Pathak highlighting the massive data breach and seeking immediate action. https://sekarreporter.com/on-monday-justice-m-dhandapani-briefly-heard-the-petition-filed-by-cyber-security-researcher-himanshu-pathak-highlighting-the-massive-data-breach-and-seeking-immediate-action/

Uncategorized

on Monday, Justice M Dhandapani briefly heard the petition filed by cyber security researcher Himanshu Pathak highlighting the massive data breach and seeking immediate action. https://sekarreporter.com/on-monday-justice-m-dhandapani-briefly-heard-the-petition-filed-by-cyber-security-researcher-himanshu-pathak-highlighting-the-massive-data-breach-and-seeking-immediate-action/

on Monday, Justice M Dhandapani briefly heard the petition filed by cyber security researcher Himanshu Pathak highlighting the massive data breach and seeking immediate action. https://sekarreporter.com/on-monday-justice-m-dhandapani-briefly-heard-the-petition-filed-by-cyber-security-researcher-himanshu-pathak-highlighting-the-massive-data-breach-and-seeking-immediate-action/

[14/10, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) SCC ( cri ) 611 : sangeet vs state of haryana : section 432 of CRPC applicable in only two situations , where a convict is to be given ” additional remission or remission for a period over and above the period that he is entitled to or he is awarded under a statutory rule framed by the appropriate government or under the jail manual and where a convict is sentenced to life imprisonment which is for an indefinite period subject to procedural and substantive checks[14/10, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) CCC 621 : shiv mandir prabandhak committee , khatik mandi and others vs piara singh and others : law of amendment of pleadings is liberal and amendment of pleadings can be allowed before commencement of trial by compensating other party with costs , amendment of pleading after commencement of trial has been curtailed but amendment of pleadings before commencement of trial continues to be liberal ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )[14/10, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2020 (4) CTC 201 : shantilal kothari vs sathrasala venkatram : Executing court cannot sit as Appellate authority over ex parte judgement to reverse decree or declare judgement as nullity and inexecutable ( order 47 CPC 1908)[14/10, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2012 (4) CCC 133 SC : M/ S Payal vision ltd vs Radhika choudhary : Structural changes made by tenant with or without landlords consent does not affect tenant – landlord relationship ( order x11 rule 6 CPC 1908 ) , Admission made on the basis of pleadings in a given case cannot be taken as an admission in a different situation[14/10, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 812 : Dhananjezhiyan vs kuppu : Registration act 1908 sec 17 & 49 : unstamped and unregistered document is inadmissible in evidence , it cannot be relied upon in court proceedings when such document becomes basis of claim of person tracing his or her title

Uncategorized

[14/10, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) SCC ( cri ) 611 : sangeet vs state of haryana : section 432 of CRPC applicable in only two situations , where a convict is to be given ” additional remission or remission for a period over and above the period that he is entitled to or he is awarded under a statutory rule framed by the appropriate government or under the jail manual and where a convict is sentenced to life imprisonment which is for an indefinite period subject to procedural and substantive checks[14/10, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) CCC 621 : shiv mandir prabandhak committee , khatik mandi and others vs piara singh and others : law of amendment of pleadings is liberal and amendment of pleadings can be allowed before commencement of trial by compensating other party with costs , amendment of pleading after commencement of trial has been curtailed but amendment of pleadings before commencement of trial continues to be liberal ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )[14/10, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2020 (4) CTC 201 : shantilal kothari vs sathrasala venkatram : Executing court cannot sit as Appellate authority over ex parte judgement to reverse decree or declare judgement as nullity and inexecutable ( order 47 CPC 1908)[14/10, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2012 (4) CCC 133 SC : M/ S Payal vision ltd vs Radhika choudhary : Structural changes made by tenant with or without landlords consent does not affect tenant – landlord relationship ( order x11 rule 6 CPC 1908 ) , Admission made on the basis of pleadings in a given case cannot be taken as an admission in a different situation[14/10, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 812 : Dhananjezhiyan vs kuppu : Registration act 1908 sec 17 & 49 : unstamped and unregistered document is inadmissible in evidence , it cannot be relied upon in court proceedings when such document becomes basis of claim of person tracing his or her title

[14/10, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) SCC ( cri ) 611 : sangeet vs state of haryana : section 432 of CRPC applicable in only two situations , where a convict is to be given...

[14/10, 14:16] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/bTKqXB-pJuk?si=6EIza_dZJoNUJIz_[14/10, 14:20] sekarreporter1: Super[14/10, 14:22] Madan News 18: வாழ்த்துக்கள்💐💐💐[14/10, 14:22] Ramesh Three Sun Tv: 💐💐💐💐💐[14/10, 14:22] Anand Polimer Tv Reporter: வாழ்த்துகள் அண்ணா 💐💐💐💐[14/10, 14:22] Ramji Tv: வாழ்த்துக்கள்💐💐💐[14/10, 14:22] Tv Senthil Press: வாழ்த்துக்கள் சார்💐💐💐[14/10, 14:23] sekarreporter1: வாழ்த்துக்கள் 💐💐💐[14/10, 14:24] Maheswari C. maimurusu: வாழ்த்துகள் சார்🔥❤️‍🔥

Uncategorized

[14/10, 14:16] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/bTKqXB-pJuk?si=6EIza_dZJoNUJIz_[14/10, 14:20] sekarreporter1: Super[14/10, 14:22] Madan News 18: வாழ்த்துக்கள்💐💐💐[14/10, 14:22] Ramesh Three Sun Tv: 💐💐💐💐💐[14/10, 14:22] Anand Polimer Tv Reporter: வாழ்த்துகள் அண்ணா 💐💐💐💐[14/10, 14:22] Ramji Tv: வாழ்த்துக்கள்💐💐💐[14/10, 14:22] Tv Senthil Press: வாழ்த்துக்கள் சார்💐💐💐[14/10, 14:23] sekarreporter1: வாழ்த்துக்கள் 💐💐💐[14/10, 14:24] Maheswari C. maimurusu: வாழ்த்துகள் சார்🔥❤️‍🔥

[14/10, 14:16] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/bTKqXB-pJuk?si=6EIza_dZJoNUJIz_[14/10, 14:20] sekarreporter1: Super[14/10, 14:22] Madan News 18: வாழ்த்துக்கள்💐💐💐[14/10, 14:22] Ramesh Three Sun Tv: 💐💐💐💐💐[14/10, 14:22] Anand Polimer Tv Reporter: வாழ்த்துகள் அண்ணா 💐💐💐💐[14/10, 14:22] Ramji Tv: வாழ்த்துக்கள்💐💐💐[14/10, 14:22] Tv Senthil Press:...

சென்னை உட்பட 4 மாவட்டங்களுக்கு நாளை விடுமுறை – முதல்வர் மு.க.ஸ்டாலின் அறிவிப்பு

Uncategorized

சென்னை உட்பட 4 மாவட்டங்களுக்கு நாளை விடுமுறை – முதல்வர் மு.க.ஸ்டாலின் அறிவிப்பு

சென்னை, திருவள்ளூர், காஞ்சிபுரம் மற்றும் செங்கல்பட்டு மாவட்டங்களில் பள்ளி, கல்லூரிகளுக்கு நாளை விடுமுறை அறிவிப்பு 15.10.2024 முதல் 18.10.2024 வரை தனியார் தகவல் தொழில்நுட்ப நிறுவனங்கள் தங்கள் ஊழியர்களை வீட்டிலிருந்தே பணிபுரிய அறிவுறுத்த வேண்டும். சென்னை உட்பட 4 மாவட்டங்களுக்கு நாளை விடுமுறை – முதல்வர் மு.க.ஸ்டாலின்...

Justice B Pugalendhi observed, “The magistrates must realise that the court also has a certain responsibility and duty towards the victims. If this is the state of affairs, then no witness would have the moral courage to appear before the court for trial and depose against the accused.” He further directed the Registrar General to call for an explanation from the magistrates who dealt with the said murder case from October 2018 to March 2024.

Uncategorized

Justice B Pugalendhi observed, “The magistrates must realise that the court also has a certain responsibility and duty towards the victims. If this is the state of affairs, then no witness would have the moral courage to appear before the court for trial and depose against the accused.” He further directed the Registrar General to call for an explanation from the magistrates who dealt with the said murder case from October 2018 to March 2024.

MADURAI: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court recently directed the Registrar General of the High Court to issue a circular to all judicial magistrates instructing them to responsibly handle petitions filed by...