SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WA No.1712 of 2026 and CMP N o .15620 of 2026 E.Jeyaprabhu S/o Elango Shanmugam, Plot No.19, Bharathi Street, Krishnamoorthy Nagar, K.K.Nagar, Tiruchirappalli-620 021. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Director Department of Geology and Mining, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. 2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 3. The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 004. Respondent(s)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.07.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WA No.1712 of 2026 and CMP N o...

[02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: “Advocate M.Gnanasekar represented the Appellant while Government Pleader K. Kumaran represented the Respondent. Issue The issue before the Bench was whether a routine case-management entry, a e-court status update, or an order purely tracking the” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003#:~:text=Advocate%20M.Gnanasekar,purely%20tracking%20the [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: E-Court Case Status Or Adjournment Order Doesn’t Possess Traits Of Judgment; Writ Appeal Against It Not Maintainable: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media

Uncategorized

[02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: “Advocate M.Gnanasekar represented the Appellant while Government Pleader K. Kumaran represented the Respondent. Issue The issue before the Bench was whether a routine case-management entry, a e-court status update, or an order purely tracking the” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003#:~:text=Advocate%20M.Gnanasekar,purely%20tracking%20the [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: E-Court Case Status Or Adjournment Order Doesn’t Possess Traits Of Judgment; Writ Appeal Against It Not Maintainable: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media

[02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: “Advocate M.Gnanasekar represented the Appellant while Government Pleader K. Kumaran represented the Respondent. Issue The issue before the Bench was whether a routine case-management entry, a e-court status update, or an...

ஏ.ஐ. தொழில்நுட்பத்தை பயன்படுத்தி வழங்கப்பட்ட தீர்ப்பை ரத்துசெய்தது உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் #SupremeCourt

Uncategorized

ஏ.ஐ. தொழில்நுட்பத்தை பயன்படுத்தி வழங்கப்பட்ட தீர்ப்பை ரத்துசெய்தது உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் #SupremeCourt

ஏ.ஐ. தொழில்நுட்பத்தை பயன்படுத்தி வழங்கப்பட்ட தீர்ப்பை ரத்துசெய்தது உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் #SupremeCourt

Uncategorized

THE HON’BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 6248 of 2026 Tamilazhagan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Prison Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 3. The Superintendent of prisons, Central prison-I, Puzhal, Chennai-600 066 4. The Tamil Nadu State Legal Services

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-06-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 6248 of 2026 Tamilazhagan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The...

Uncategorized

Election Commissioner of India, the six resigned MLAs concerned, the Union Ministry of Law & Justice, and the Hon’ble Speaker of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, in strict conformity with professional practice and as a responsible Senior Lawyer, thereby ensuring that all constitutional stakeholders were placed on notice contemporaneously. S.Kasiramalingam M.A.B.L., Advocate

[02/07, 18:20] Kasi Ramalingam: In the light of the above circumstances, I hereby put you on notice of my above representation to direct the above-mentioned resigned 6 MLA’s are not at all genuine, as...

[02/07, 17:24] sekarreporter1: Madras HC Holds Civil Dispute Over Wharfage Refund Cannot Be Tried As Criminal Offence, Quashes CBI Case https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/wharfage-refund-dispute-cannot-be-given-criminal-colour-539344 [02/07, 17:25] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioner: Mr. B. Sathish Sundar, Mr.R. Rajarathinam, Sc for Mr.S. Arunachalam For Respondent: Mr. K. Srinivasan, Special Public Prosecutor” https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/wharfage-refund-dispute-cannot-be-given-criminal-colour-539344#:~:text=For%20Petitioner%3A,Special%20Public%20Prosecutor

Uncategorized

[02/07, 17:24] sekarreporter1: Madras HC Holds Civil Dispute Over Wharfage Refund Cannot Be Tried As Criminal Offence, Quashes CBI Case https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/wharfage-refund-dispute-cannot-be-given-criminal-colour-539344 [02/07, 17:25] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioner: Mr. B. Sathish Sundar, Mr.R. Rajarathinam, Sc for Mr.S. Arunachalam For Respondent: Mr. K. Srinivasan, Special Public Prosecutor” https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/wharfage-refund-dispute-cannot-be-given-criminal-colour-539344#:~:text=For%20Petitioner%3A,Special%20Public%20Prosecutor

[02/07, 17:24] sekarreporter1: Madras HC Holds Civil Dispute Over Wharfage Refund Cannot Be Tried As Criminal Offence, Quashes CBI Case https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/wharfage-refund-dispute-cannot-be-given-criminal-colour-539344 [02/07, 17:25] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioner: Mr. B. Sathish Sundar, Mr.R. Rajarathinam, Sc for...

Uncategorized

Hon’ble Court observed that the writ petition had been taken up at a very late stage, when the Special TNTET examination was scheduled to be conducted within a short time. In view of the imminent examination, the Court indicated that the present examination may proceed in accordance with the existing notification and that the petitioners should participate in the examination under the present scheme.

[02/07, 13:09] sekarreporter1: [02/07, 15:33] sekarreporter1: [02/07, 15:30] Mythreye Chandru: former SGP education / A writ petition was filed by serving B.T. Assistant Teachers before the Hon’ble Madras High Court challenging only the examination...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com