SEKAR REPORTER Blog

sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1815635195569344645?t=c0dTZltRSO-GHQUCpDXicQ&s=08[23/07, 11:59] sekarreporter1: W.P. 20366 of 2024 – Learned Senior Counsel Mr. A. L. Somayaji and Mr. Jayesh B. Dolia instructed by T. Karthi for M/s. Aiyar & Dolia represented on behalf of M/s. Blue Cross of India and put forth various submissions. The Ld. Senior Counsels argued that the TNAWB lacked jurisdiction and authority to conduct such an inspection of the premises, especially when the AWBI specifically requested the GCC to conduct the same

sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1815635195569344645?t=c0dTZltRSO-GHQUCpDXicQ&s=08[23/07, 11:59] sekarreporter1: W.P. 20366 of 2024 – Learned Senior Counsel Mr. A. L. Somayaji and Mr. Jayesh B. Dolia instructed by T. Karthi for M/s. Aiyar & Dolia represented on behalf of M/s. Blue Cross of India and put forth various submissions. The Ld. Senior Counsels argued that the TNAWB lacked jurisdiction and authority to conduct such an inspection of the premises, especially when the AWBI specifically requested the GCC to conduct the same

[23/07, 11:59] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1815635195569344645?t=c0dTZltRSO-GHQUCpDXicQ&s=08[23/07, 11:59] sekarreporter1: W.P. 20366 of 2024 – Learned Senior Counsel Mr. A. L. Somayaji and Mr. Jayesh B. Dolia instructed by T. Karthi for M/s. Aiyar & Dolia represented on...

[23/07, 10:40] Vinothpandian: 2018(3) SCC ( cri ) 232 : state of Rajasthan vs mohan lal : gravity of crime ,motive ,nature of crime and other attending circumstances to be borne in mind ,imposition of inadequate sentence does more harm to judicial system ,court must see that victim does not lose confidence in judicial system and resort to private vengeance[23/07, 10:40] Vinothpandian: 2004 (9) SCC 421 : chairman , Ludhiana improvement trust vs kanwaljit singh : word ” civil contempt ” means wilful disobedience to any judgement , decree , direction , order , writ or other process of a court or wilful breach of an undertaking given to a court[23/07, 10:40] Vinothpandian: 1972 (4) SCC 412 : NB mirzan vs The disciplinary committee of the bar council of maharastra : demand of money from client towards court expenses without actually spending the amount for the purpose , the advocate is guilty of professional misconduct[23/07, 10:40] Vinothpandian: AIR 2000 MAD 4 ; Akbar Ali vs Alla pitchai : It is the duty of court to issue notice to counsel who had filed caveat and without hearing the counsel , order should not be passed ( sec 148 A CPC 1908 )

[23/07, 10:40] Vinothpandian: 2018(3) SCC ( cri ) 232 : state of Rajasthan vs mohan lal : gravity of crime ,motive ,nature of crime and other attending circumstances to be borne in mind ,imposition of inadequate sentence does more harm to judicial system ,court must see that victim does not lose confidence in judicial system and resort to private vengeance[23/07, 10:40] Vinothpandian: 2004 (9) SCC 421 : chairman , Ludhiana improvement trust vs kanwaljit singh : word ” civil contempt ” means wilful disobedience to any judgement , decree , direction , order , writ or other process of a court or wilful breach of an undertaking given to a court[23/07, 10:40] Vinothpandian: 1972 (4) SCC 412 : NB mirzan vs The disciplinary committee of the bar council of maharastra : demand of money from client towards court expenses without actually spending the amount for the purpose , the advocate is guilty of professional misconduct[23/07, 10:40] Vinothpandian: AIR 2000 MAD 4 ; Akbar Ali vs Alla pitchai : It is the duty of court to issue notice to counsel who had filed caveat and without hearing the counsel , order should not be passed ( sec 148 A CPC 1908 )

[23/07, 10:40] Vinothpandian: 2018(3) SCC ( cri ) 232 : state of Rajasthan vs mohan lal : gravity of crime ,motive ,nature of crime and other attending circumstances to be borne in mind ,imposition...

WP No.18163 of 2024THE HON’BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU, J.The petitioner seeks a direction against the official respondents to consider the representation dated 14.06.2024 and pass orders for changing the alignment plan in connection with the Metro Rail Project made by the fifth respondent and approved by the sixth respondent in respect of the Five Tier Temple Raja Gopuram of Sri Rathina Vinayakar Durgai Amman Temple, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chennai.

WP No.18163 of 2024THE HON’BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU, J.The petitioner seeks a direction against the official respondents to consider the representation dated 14.06.2024 and pass orders for changing the alignment plan in connection with the Metro Rail Project made by the fifth respondent and approved by the sixth respondent in respect of the Five Tier Temple Raja Gopuram of Sri Rathina Vinayakar Durgai Amman Temple, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chennai.

WP No.18163 of 2024THE HON’BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU, J.The petitioner seeks a direction against the official respondents to consider the representation dated 14.06.2024 and pass orders for changing the alignment plan in...

அரவிந்த் தாதாரின் சட்டக் குறிப்புகள்: இளைய வழக்கறிஞர்களுக்கான கட்டாயக் கட்டணம்

அரவிந்த் தாதாரின் சட்டக் குறிப்புகள்: இளைய வழக்கறிஞர்களுக்கான கட்டாயக் கட்டணம்

பதிவு நெடுவரிசைகள் அரவிந்த் தாதாரின் சட்டக் குறிப்புகள்: இளைய வழக்கறிஞர்களுக்கான கட்டாயக் கட்டணம் இதுபோன்ற விரிவான வழிகாட்டுதல்களை வழங்குவதற்கு முன், இந்த விஷயத்தை ஒரு குழுவிற்கு அனுப்பி, ஒரு சில வழக்கறிஞர் சங்கங்களிடமிருந்து உள்ளீடுகளைப் பெறுவதுதான் குறைந்தபட்சம் செய்திருக்க முடியும். அரவிந்த் தாதாரின் சட்டக் குறிப்புகள் அரவிந்த்...

ஐகோர்ட் today News tamil July 23

ஐகோர்ட் today News tamil July 23

[22/07, 10:57] sekarreporter1: முந்தைய ஆட்சியில் சட்டமன்றத்துக்குள் குட்கா எடுத்துச் சென்ற விவகாரம் முதலமைச்சர் ஸ்டாலின் உள்ளிட்ட திமுக எம்எல்ஏக்களுக்கு எதிரான உரிமை மீறல் நோட்டீஸ் ரத்து செய்ததை எதிர்த்து தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்ட மேல்முறையீட்டு வழக்குகளை ஜூலை 25க்கு தள்ளி வைத்தது சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் வழக்கில் எதிர்மனுதாரர்களாக...

Mhc today July 23 news roundup [23/07, 07:13] sekarreporter1: https://www.barandbench.com/news/pil-madras-high-court-regulate-youtube-conform-indian-law-religious-beliefs[23/07, 07:13] sekarreporter1: https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2024/Jul/22/madras-high-court-grants-bail-to-inspector-in-abetment-of-suicide-case[23/07, 07:14] sekarreporter1: https://www.deccanchronicle.com/southern-states/tamil-nadu/reconsider-ban-on-toddy-madras-high-court-tells-tamil-nadu-govt-1811660[23/07, 07:14] sekarreporter1: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/madras-high-court-initiates-suo-motu-hearing-into-egmore-lawyers-clash/articleshow/111939584.cms[23/07, 07:14] sekarreporter1: https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=79638[23/07, 07:16] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court suspends life sentence of three in murder case – https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2024/Jul/22/madras-high-court-suspends-life-sentence-of-three-in-murder-case[23/07, 07:16] sekarreporter1: https://www.barandbench.com/news/madras-high-court-judge-should-avoided-remarks-brother-judge-supreme-court

Mhc today July 23 news roundup [23/07, 07:13] sekarreporter1: https://www.barandbench.com/news/pil-madras-high-court-regulate-youtube-conform-indian-law-religious-beliefs[23/07, 07:13] sekarreporter1: https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2024/Jul/22/madras-high-court-grants-bail-to-inspector-in-abetment-of-suicide-case[23/07, 07:14] sekarreporter1: https://www.deccanchronicle.com/southern-states/tamil-nadu/reconsider-ban-on-toddy-madras-high-court-tells-tamil-nadu-govt-1811660[23/07, 07:14] sekarreporter1: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/madras-high-court-initiates-suo-motu-hearing-into-egmore-lawyers-clash/articleshow/111939584.cms[23/07, 07:14] sekarreporter1: https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=79638[23/07, 07:16] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court suspends life sentence of three in murder case – https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2024/Jul/22/madras-high-court-suspends-life-sentence-of-three-in-murder-case[23/07, 07:16] sekarreporter1: https://www.barandbench.com/news/madras-high-court-judge-should-avoided-remarks-brother-judge-supreme-court

[23/07, 07:13] sekarreporter1: https://www.barandbench.com/news/pil-madras-high-court-regulate-youtube-conform-indian-law-religious-beliefs[23/07, 07:13] sekarreporter1: https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2024/Jul/22/madras-high-court-grants-bail-to-inspector-in-abetment-of-suicide-case[23/07, 07:14] sekarreporter1: https://www.deccanchronicle.com/southern-states/tamil-nadu/reconsider-ban-on-toddy-madras-high-court-tells-tamil-nadu-govt-1811660[23/07, 07:14] sekarreporter1: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/madras-high-court-initiates-suo-motu-hearing-into-egmore-lawyers-clash/articleshow/111939584.cms[23/07, 07:14] sekarreporter1: https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=79638[23/07, 07:16] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court suspends life sentence of three in murder case – https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2024/Jul/22/madras-high-court-suspends-life-sentence-of-three-in-murder-case[23/07, 07:16] sekarreporter1: https://www.barandbench.com/news/madras-high-court-judge-should-avoided-remarks-brother-judge-supreme-court

[22/07, 22:07] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1815425428527390913?t=AypX6gwfImVC4eRiwKtZHQ&s=08[22/07, 22:08] sekarreporter1: The Hon’ble Apex Court comprising of Hon’ble Justice MM Sunderesh and Hon’ble Justice Aravind Kumar has clarified a position of law on a SLP filed by the law association challenging the orders of Hon’ble Madras Highcourt and consequent amendments that was brought into the Central Motor Vehicle Rules and its interpretation with regard to the newly amended Rule 36 ,35 ,150A, 168, 169, 176.The law association was represented by Learned Senior Counsel S Prabakaran who mainly raised arguements about the implementation of annuity scheme as it would cause unnecessary hardship to the claimant to receive the money in lump-sum which he would be entitled and it was submitted by Mr S Prabakaran that the term period for the money to be settled to the victim stipulated in the annuity scheme is unwarranted as it would not benefit the claimant especially in disputes that are resolved through mediation.The senior Mr S Prabakaran further raised objections towards rule 150 A on submitting that the said rule would go against the parent legislation, Section 166, 168 ,169 of Motor Vehicles Act as the aforementioned section have proper mechanism dealing with accident claim. The learned Senior counsel though accepted that the legislation is one of wellfare legislation, contended that the claimant should not suffer any disadvantage. Further the Senior stressed upon legal assistance to the claimant in all phases in the claim process, on these contentions the senior sought certain clarification from the Hon’ble court.In other hand amicus Vijay Raghavan submitted that rule 150A merely deals with procedures for investigation in road accidents and the same cannot be said that it is against parent statue. The Hon’ble Supreme Court comprising of Hon’ble Justice MM Sunderesh and Hon’ble Justice Aravind Kumar clarified the position of law that rule 150A has to be read with Section 159 of the Act as it being incidental and ancillary in a claim petition which is made amply clear under Section 166(4) and further the Hon’ble Court observed that rule 35 and 36 gives ample discretion to the tribunal to adapt an appropriate mechanism to disperse the claim/ award amount to the claimant and it is for the the tribunal to exercise such power. The Hon’ble apex court by observing the aforesaid position disposed the SLP with clarifying the position of law that it is for the tribunal to excersice the power in the annuity scheme and the disposal of award amount to claimant either in full or in parts.

[22/07, 22:07] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1815425428527390913?t=AypX6gwfImVC4eRiwKtZHQ&s=08[22/07, 22:08] sekarreporter1: The Hon’ble Apex Court comprising of Hon’ble Justice MM Sunderesh and Hon’ble Justice Aravind Kumar has clarified a position of law on a SLP filed by the law association challenging the orders of Hon’ble Madras Highcourt and consequent amendments that was brought into the Central Motor Vehicle Rules and its interpretation with regard to the newly amended Rule 36 ,35 ,150A, 168, 169, 176.The law association was represented by Learned Senior Counsel S Prabakaran who mainly raised arguements about the implementation of annuity scheme as it would cause unnecessary hardship to the claimant to receive the money in lump-sum which he would be entitled and it was submitted by Mr S Prabakaran that the term period for the money to be settled to the victim stipulated in the annuity scheme is unwarranted as it would not benefit the claimant especially in disputes that are resolved through mediation.The senior Mr S Prabakaran further raised objections towards rule 150 A on submitting that the said rule would go against the parent legislation, Section 166, 168 ,169 of Motor Vehicles Act as the aforementioned section have proper mechanism dealing with accident claim. The learned Senior counsel though accepted that the legislation is one of wellfare legislation, contended that the claimant should not suffer any disadvantage. Further the Senior stressed upon legal assistance to the claimant in all phases in the claim process, on these contentions the senior sought certain clarification from the Hon’ble court.In other hand amicus Vijay Raghavan submitted that rule 150A merely deals with procedures for investigation in road accidents and the same cannot be said that it is against parent statue. The Hon’ble Supreme Court comprising of Hon’ble Justice MM Sunderesh and Hon’ble Justice Aravind Kumar clarified the position of law that rule 150A has to be read with Section 159 of the Act as it being incidental and ancillary in a claim petition which is made amply clear under Section 166(4) and further the Hon’ble Court observed that rule 35 and 36 gives ample discretion to the tribunal to adapt an appropriate mechanism to disperse the claim/ award amount to the claimant and it is for the the tribunal to exercise such power. The Hon’ble apex court by observing the aforesaid position disposed the SLP with clarifying the position of law that it is for the tribunal to excersice the power in the annuity scheme and the disposal of award amount to claimant either in full or in parts.

[22/07, 22:07] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1815425428527390913?t=AypX6gwfImVC4eRiwKtZHQ&s=08[22/07, 22:08] sekarreporter1: The Hon’ble Apex Court comprising of Hon’ble Justice MM Sunderesh and Hon’ble Justice Aravind Kumar has clarified a position of law on a SLP filed by the law...

MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMARMr. N. Vijayaraghavan, Amicus Curiae Mr. Nikhil Menon, Adv.Mr. Vipin Nair, AOR Ms. M.B. Ramya, Adv.Mr. Mohd Aman Alam, Adv.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth, AOR Mr. Anshul Saxena, Adv.Mr. Harshit Manwani, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv.Mr. Jagdish Chandra, Adv. Mr. Niteen Kumar Sinha, AOR Ms. T. Archana, AORMr. Yusuf, AOR

MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMARMr. N. Vijayaraghavan, Amicus Curiae Mr. Nikhil Menon, Adv.Mr. Vipin Nair, AOR Ms. M.B. Ramya, Adv.Mr. Mohd Aman Alam, Adv.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth, AOR Mr. Anshul Saxena, Adv.Mr. Harshit Manwani, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv.Mr. Jagdish Chandra, Adv. Mr. Niteen Kumar Sinha, AOR Ms. T. Archana, AORMr. Yusuf, AOR

ITEM NO.49 COURT NO.13 SECTION XS U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I ARECORD OF PROCEEDINGSWrit Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 534/2020BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY PRIVATE...