![[3/10, 14:36] Sekarreporter 1: Madras HC dismisses the first election petition preferred after the 2016 Assembly polls in TN. Rejects a plea filed by AIADMK candidate SP Rajendran challenging the victory of DMK’s P. Seethapathy by a margin of 101 votes from Tindivanam (reserved) constituency. @THChennai [3/10, 14:36] Sekarreporter 1: #Breaking : நடிகர் சங்க தேர்தல் நடத்த பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவுக்கு இடைக்கால தடை * விஷால் தொடர்ந்த வழக்கில், சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு * தேர்தலை 3 மாதத்திற்குள் நடத்தி முடிக்க வேண்டும் என்ற தனி நீதிபதியின் உத்தரவுக்கும் இடைக்கால தடை (1/2) #NadigarSangam | #Vishal | #HighCourt https://t.co/8VM1FJ45ra](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story The reliance of the petitioner on the decision in Kabali @ Kabalesswaran v. State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 and others[2], is of no assistance to the petitioner as the facts in that case had found acceptance by the Court in accepting that petitioner’s prayer. The situation is not in parimeteria in this case. This Writ Petition is dismissed as is the connected miscellaneous petition. However, there will be no order as to costs. 21.06.2023 Index : Yes Speaking Order Neutral citatio. Petitioner : Mr.Mohan, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.S.Palaniswamy For Respondents : Mr.R.Sankaranarayanan, Additional Solicitor General assisted by Mr.V.Sundareswaran (for R1 to R3) Senior Panel Counsel Mr.P.Kumaresan, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.Alagu Goutham (for R4) Government Advocate Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan for Mr.Ravichandran (in Crl.OP.11024/2006) n : Yes Sl To 1.The Union of India, Rep by its Secretary to Government, Department of Revenue & Intelligence, New Delhi. 2.The Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Government of India, 7th Floor, D-Block, Indraprasatha Bhawan, Indraprasatha Estate, New Delhi. 3.Senior Intelligence Officer, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) O/o, Director of Revenue Intelligence, No.25, Gopala Krishna (Iyer) Road T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017. 4.The Government of Tamilnadu Rep by Secretary to Government, Public (Law & order-E) Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9. DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. Sl WP.No.23868 of 2012 and MP.No.1 of 2013 21.06.2023 [1] [(2006) 3 SCC 178] [2] [2006-3-L.W.81]
- Previous story Judges ss sunder and baratha chakravarthi. பிளாஸ்டர் ஆப் பாரீஸ் மூலம் செய்யப்பட்ட விநாயகர் சிலைகளை விற்கலாம் என உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரைக்கிளை தனி நீதிபதி ஜி.ஆர்.சுவாமிநாதன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவுக்கு இரு நீதிபதிகள் அமர்வு தடை
Recent Posts
- mhc today sep 10 news round up
- There are two instances possible. One at the instigation of the prisoners and other at the instigation of the prison authority. Once the prison authorities strictly comply with the rules, possibility of unrest inside the prison may be minimised. Therefore, equal treatment of prisoners will also be a theory for better administration of prisoners. Inequality will create frustration and restlessness in the mind of the prisoners and therefore the prison authorities are expected to perform their duties lawfully and scrupulously in accordance with the prison manual. It is needless to state that the prisoners who are committing misconduct or offences are liable to be punished under the prison manual by following due procedures as contemplated. Therefore, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has to secure appropriate instructions and file an affidavit.
- THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIAEXTRA-ORDINARY APPELLATE JURISDICTIONSPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 3056 OF 2023CHOUDAPPA & ANR. PETITIONER(S)VERSUS CHOUDAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS. & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)ORDERHeard learned senior counsel for theparties.The challenge in the present special leave petition is to the revisional order dated 22nd July, 2022 passed by the High Court dismissing the revision of the petitioners arising from the rejection of their application alleged to have been filed under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(for short, ‘C.P.C.’).A suit for recovery of possession and
- Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice R. Mahadevan clarified that an application seeking the determination of mesne profits, even if filed decades later, is merely a reminder for the court to complete an inquiry and does not constitute a new suit or execution.
- வக்கீல் ஏற்காடு ஏ.மோகன்தாஸ் தரப்பில் வக்கீல் யானை ராஜேந்திரன் ஆஜராகி, ‘‘கள்ளக்குறிச்சி கைதான கண்ணுக்குட்டி என்பவர் மீது 31 சாராய வழக்குகள் உள்ளன. 20 ஆண்டுகளாக சாராய தொழில் செய்வதாக கூறியுள்ளார். அதனால், ஆளும் கட்சியாக தி.மு.க., மீது மட்டும் குற்றம் சாட்டவில்லை. சாராய தொழிலுக்கு அ.தி.மு.க.,வும் துணை போய் உள்ளது. உள்ளூர்
More
Recent Posts
- mhc today sep 10 news round up
- There are two instances possible. One at the instigation of the prisoners and other at the instigation of the prison authority. Once the prison authorities strictly comply with the rules, possibility of unrest inside the prison may be minimised. Therefore, equal treatment of prisoners will also be a theory for better administration of prisoners. Inequality will create frustration and restlessness in the mind of the prisoners and therefore the prison authorities are expected to perform their duties lawfully and scrupulously in accordance with the prison manual. It is needless to state that the prisoners who are committing misconduct or offences are liable to be punished under the prison manual by following due procedures as contemplated. Therefore, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has to secure appropriate instructions and file an affidavit.
- THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIAEXTRA-ORDINARY APPELLATE JURISDICTIONSPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 3056 OF 2023CHOUDAPPA & ANR. PETITIONER(S)VERSUS CHOUDAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS. & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)ORDERHeard learned senior counsel for theparties.The challenge in the present special leave petition is to the revisional order dated 22nd July, 2022 passed by the High Court dismissing the revision of the petitioners arising from the rejection of their application alleged to have been filed under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(for short, ‘C.P.C.’).A suit for recovery of possession and
- Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice R. Mahadevan clarified that an application seeking the determination of mesne profits, even if filed decades later, is merely a reminder for the court to complete an inquiry and does not constitute a new suit or execution.
- வக்கீல் ஏற்காடு ஏ.மோகன்தாஸ் தரப்பில் வக்கீல் யானை ராஜேந்திரன் ஆஜராகி, ‘‘கள்ளக்குறிச்சி கைதான கண்ணுக்குட்டி என்பவர் மீது 31 சாராய வழக்குகள் உள்ளன. 20 ஆண்டுகளாக சாராய தொழில் செய்வதாக கூறியுள்ளார். அதனால், ஆளும் கட்சியாக தி.மு.க., மீது மட்டும் குற்றம் சாட்டவில்லை. சாராய தொழிலுக்கு அ.தி.மு.க.,வும் துணை போய் உள்ளது. உள்ளூர்