Follow:
- Next story Accepting the argument of Mr.N.Ramesh, counsel for Junior Vikatan that this is assault on the freedom of press, the Hon’ble Court judge g r swaminathan granted Anticipatory Bail to 2 reporters against whom FIR was registered by State under Sections 505(1)(b), 188 & 447 of IPC.
- Previous story This is Prananandha – a dentist from Erode. #MadrasHC has closed a HCP moved by his mother alleging illegal detention in #Nithiyananda’s ashram. Today he appeared in HC and said that he is in the ashram of his own volition
Recent Posts
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIW. P.No. 25446 of 2021andW.M.P.No.26886 of 2021Dhanraj Baid Jain College,(Institution of Tamil Nadu Educational & Medical Trust),
- THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYW.P.No.27875 of 2024& W.M.P.No.30397 of 2024/Upon production of proof with regard to the payment as stated above, the concerned Appellate Authority shall consider and dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law, by providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, without pressing for limitation. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
- this year, Srinivasan filed a civil suit against the Madras Music Academy,
- vacation bench of Justice PB Balaji and Justice G Arul Murugan heard the PIL moved by T Vennila, from Chennai. The petitioner contended that in the past four years unskilled field workers have lost their lives in Tangedco solely because they were made to perform tasks that they were neither recruited for nor trained to do the tasks. Apart from these 70 fatalities, there have been recurrent life-altering accidents, wherein over a 100 victims have been physically disabled, she said.
- The Madras High Court presided over by Justice Lakshminarayanan ruled in favour of Sindhuja setting aside the earlier order of the Family Court. The High Court directed the family welfare court to determine appropriate compensation for Sindhuja, emphasising that under Section 18 of the Domestic Violence Act, the victim’s protection must come first.
More
Recent Posts
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIW. P.No. 25446 of 2021andW.M.P.No.26886 of 2021Dhanraj Baid Jain College,(Institution of Tamil Nadu Educational & Medical Trust),
- THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYW.P.No.27875 of 2024& W.M.P.No.30397 of 2024/Upon production of proof with regard to the payment as stated above, the concerned Appellate Authority shall consider and dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law, by providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, without pressing for limitation. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
- this year, Srinivasan filed a civil suit against the Madras Music Academy,
- vacation bench of Justice PB Balaji and Justice G Arul Murugan heard the PIL moved by T Vennila, from Chennai. The petitioner contended that in the past four years unskilled field workers have lost their lives in Tangedco solely because they were made to perform tasks that they were neither recruited for nor trained to do the tasks. Apart from these 70 fatalities, there have been recurrent life-altering accidents, wherein over a 100 victims have been physically disabled, she said.
- The Madras High Court presided over by Justice Lakshminarayanan ruled in favour of Sindhuja setting aside the earlier order of the Family Court. The High Court directed the family welfare court to determine appropriate compensation for Sindhuja, emphasising that under Section 18 of the Domestic Violence Act, the victim’s protection must come first.