![[4/23, 07:24] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/H_0BnCsU6ro [4/23, 07:25] sekarreporter1: சுவையான தித்திக்கும் பேச்சு v Rama subramaniyam sc judge வக்கீலாக இருக்கும் போது காலை 7.30 மணிக்கு சீனியர் office போய்விடுவேன் [4/23, 07:25] sekarreporter1: 💐💐🌹](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Accepting the argument of Mr.N.Ramesh, counsel for Junior Vikatan that this is assault on the freedom of press, the Hon’ble Court judge g r swaminathan granted Anticipatory Bail to 2 reporters against whom FIR was registered by State under Sections 505(1)(b), 188 & 447 of IPC.
- Previous story This is Prananandha – a dentist from Erode. #MadrasHC has closed a HCP moved by his mother alleging illegal detention in #Nithiyananda’s ashram. Today he appeared in HC and said that he is in the ashram of his own volition
Recent Posts
- தூத்துக்குடி போலீஸ் துப்பாக்கி சூடு | தமிழக அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் கேள்வி! NHRC விசாரணைப் பிரிவின் அறிக்கை மீது நீதிபதிகள் ஜே.நிஷா பானு மற்றும் என்.மாலா ஆகியோர், அரசு எடுத்த நடவடிக்கையை கண்டறியுமாறு ஏஜி ஆர்.சுண்முகசுந்தரத்திடம் கேட்டுக் கொண்டனர்.
- நீதிபதி தண்டபாணி திரைப்பட இசை கலைஞர்கள் சங்கத்துற்கு வருகிற 24ம் தேதி ஞாயிற்றுகிழமை தேரத்ல் நடத்தை இடைக்கால தடை உத்தரவு பிறப்பித்தார். வழக்கு தாக்கல.செய தவர் முன்னாள். Add pp ஜோதிகுமார்
- S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. and C.SARAVANAN,J. ar 4. In our previous order dated 25.08.2023, we had clearly held that the order has to be complied with in letter and spirit, as otherwise, they have to cast their appearance before this Court on the next date of hearing. Moreover, a Statutory Notice was also issued to the respondents as early as on 06.04.2023. Though the presence of the respondents / contemnors had been dispensed with on 01.06.2023, it does not mean that this Court has given license to disobey the order of this Court. The respondents, namely, Mrs.Swarna I.A.S., and Mrs.Mythili K.Rajendran I.A.S. have neither chosen to comply with the order of this Court nor to appear before this Court and the act of the respondents is highly deprecated, thereby making a mockery of the Court and the judicial system. Hence, we are inclined to issue a Bailable Warrant to the respondents to secure their presence. Registry is directed to issue a Bailable Warrant to Mrs.Swarna I.A.S., and Mrs.Mythili K.Rajendran I.A.S / Contemnors, returnable by 04.10.2023. Post on 04.10.2023. (S.V.N.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.) 20.09.2023 ar Note: Issue order copy AND WARRANT on 21.09.2023 Cont.P.No.563 of 2022
- Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) SCC 493 : Extra judicial executive victim families assn vs union of india : Regarding fake encounters custodial deaths , writ is maintainable even though alternative remedy before NHRC was available
- TN Advocate General R Shunmugasundaram has rejected an application filed by Savukku Shankar seeking consent to initiate criminal contempt of court proceedings against DMK organisation secretary R.S. Bharathi. Says, criticism cannot be contempt @THChennai
More
Recent Posts
- தூத்துக்குடி போலீஸ் துப்பாக்கி சூடு | தமிழக அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் கேள்வி! NHRC விசாரணைப் பிரிவின் அறிக்கை மீது நீதிபதிகள் ஜே.நிஷா பானு மற்றும் என்.மாலா ஆகியோர், அரசு எடுத்த நடவடிக்கையை கண்டறியுமாறு ஏஜி ஆர்.சுண்முகசுந்தரத்திடம் கேட்டுக் கொண்டனர்.
- நீதிபதி தண்டபாணி திரைப்பட இசை கலைஞர்கள் சங்கத்துற்கு வருகிற 24ம் தேதி ஞாயிற்றுகிழமை தேரத்ல் நடத்தை இடைக்கால தடை உத்தரவு பிறப்பித்தார். வழக்கு தாக்கல.செய தவர் முன்னாள். Add pp ஜோதிகுமார்
- S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. and C.SARAVANAN,J. ar 4. In our previous order dated 25.08.2023, we had clearly held that the order has to be complied with in letter and spirit, as otherwise, they have to cast their appearance before this Court on the next date of hearing. Moreover, a Statutory Notice was also issued to the respondents as early as on 06.04.2023. Though the presence of the respondents / contemnors had been dispensed with on 01.06.2023, it does not mean that this Court has given license to disobey the order of this Court. The respondents, namely, Mrs.Swarna I.A.S., and Mrs.Mythili K.Rajendran I.A.S. have neither chosen to comply with the order of this Court nor to appear before this Court and the act of the respondents is highly deprecated, thereby making a mockery of the Court and the judicial system. Hence, we are inclined to issue a Bailable Warrant to the respondents to secure their presence. Registry is directed to issue a Bailable Warrant to Mrs.Swarna I.A.S., and Mrs.Mythili K.Rajendran I.A.S / Contemnors, returnable by 04.10.2023. Post on 04.10.2023. (S.V.N.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.) 20.09.2023 ar Note: Issue order copy AND WARRANT on 21.09.2023 Cont.P.No.563 of 2022
- Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) SCC 493 : Extra judicial executive victim families assn vs union of india : Regarding fake encounters custodial deaths , writ is maintainable even though alternative remedy before NHRC was available
- TN Advocate General R Shunmugasundaram has rejected an application filed by Savukku Shankar seeking consent to initiate criminal contempt of court proceedings against DMK organisation secretary R.S. Bharathi. Says, criticism cannot be contempt @THChennai