அன்பு ஜோதி ஆசிரம வழக்கு விசாரணை நிலை குறித்த அறிக்கை தாக்கல் செய்ய உத்தரவு

You may also like...

• 

  This, in our opinion, is aimed to reduce unemployment to a considerable extent.  For this purpose, the companies evolve their own procedure to assess the suitability or capability of the candidate to take up specific assignment to be assigned by them.  An employer who employs a person can always put in place certain conditions which they deem it appropriate as a condition precedent for offering employment.  Having regard to the above, we refrain ourselves from issuing any positive direction to the respondents to evolve a mechanism to treat all the students equally while conducting campus interview at the behest of Indian or Multinational companies in the educational institutions.  At the same time, we deem it appropriate to observe that the educational institutions, before permitting the Indian or multinational companies to conduct campus interview, can only verify their credentials, their existence in the field atleast for a period of three years prior to the conduct of campus interview etc., so as to ensure that the shell companies are not permitted to participate in such recruitment drive and that the employer, who employs the students, are in a position to adhere to the terms and conditions with which they employs. Subject to the aforesaid observation, we dispose of this writ petition.  No costs.   (R.M.D., J)       (J.S.N.P. J)                  16.12.2022 rsh Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No To The State of Tamil Nadu     rep. by its Chief Secretary to Government     Fort St. George     Chennai – 600 009 The State of Tamil Nadu by its Secretary to Government     Information Technology Department     Chennai – 600 009 The State of Tamil Nadu by its Secretary to Government     Higher Education Department     Chennai – 600 009 The Registrar     Anna University     Sardar Patel Road     Old Highways Building     Guindy, Chennai – 600 025 R.MAHADEVAN, J.                   and  J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD  , J. rsh WP (MD) No. 22168 of 2016 16.12.2022

  December 20, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 20, 2022

• 

  HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN C.R.P. No.676 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 V.K.John …. Petitioner Vs 1. S.Mukanchand Bothra & HUF (died) Represented by Mukanchand Bothra the petitioner challenged the Arbitration Award under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, it is not maintainable and liable to be dismissed. 12. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connect miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 03.02.2023

  February 10, 2023

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 10, 2023

• 

  10.05.’21, LAW NOTES:* *“Judicial Review of orders of Election Commission”*

  May 10, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published May 10, 2021