Follow:
- Next story Coal tender case full order THE HON-BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI. W.P.No.4389/2021 : Mr.M.S.Krishnan, Senior Counsel for Mr.Adith Narayan Vijayaraghavan. —-+Further, it is also reported that the Corrigendum has been issued extending the time limit by providing additional 15 days time and therefore the respondent shall ensure the publication of Tender Notification in the Indian Trade Journal for enabling other bidders to participate in the Tender. Even if Code of Conduct is issued, it is open to the respondent to approach the Election Commission for proceeding with the work by referring the need for the coal. The Writ Petitions are, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs. The connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
- Previous story Sasikala today interview in chennai
Recent Posts
- MCQ question 1.We the people” book was written by ________ a. N.P.Palkhiwala b.Plato c. Maxwell d. None of the above
- 5 lakhs fine MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Contempt Petition No.556 of 2024 and Sub Appl Nos.174, 175 of 2024 and 72 of 2025 Elephant G. Rajendran Advocate, Plot No.4, Door No.10/301, Anjaneyar Koil Street, Vengaivasal, Chennai 600 126. … Petitioner Versus Mr.Shiv Das Meena, IAS., The Chief Secrtary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 9. Mr.P.Amudha, I.A.S., The Home Secretary,
- Justices N Mala and G Arul Murugan issued the order, citing concerns over the large-scale violence that had erupted during a similar event organised by the party in
- Justices MS Ramesh and N Senthilkumar dismissed the convict’s appeal against the Mahila Court’s 2019 judgment, noting that
- Centre told the Division Bench of Justices J. Nisha Banu and S. Srimathy that a separate scientific method, prescribed by an expert body, was being followed.The court observed that upon perusal of the materials available on record, it was seen that the petition was premature. There was no data before the court to compare and determine the correctness of the rankings. The court was not inclined to entertain the petition, it observed, adding that if the petitioner was aggrieved after the publication of the list, he might challenge it with the evidence.
More
Recent Posts
- MCQ question 1.We the people” book was written by ________ a. N.P.Palkhiwala b.Plato c. Maxwell d. None of the above
- 5 lakhs fine MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Contempt Petition No.556 of 2024 and Sub Appl Nos.174, 175 of 2024 and 72 of 2025 Elephant G. Rajendran Advocate, Plot No.4, Door No.10/301, Anjaneyar Koil Street, Vengaivasal, Chennai 600 126. … Petitioner Versus Mr.Shiv Das Meena, IAS., The Chief Secrtary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 9. Mr.P.Amudha, I.A.S., The Home Secretary,
- Justices N Mala and G Arul Murugan issued the order, citing concerns over the large-scale violence that had erupted during a similar event organised by the party in
- Justices MS Ramesh and N Senthilkumar dismissed the convict’s appeal against the Mahila Court’s 2019 judgment, noting that
- Centre told the Division Bench of Justices J. Nisha Banu and S. Srimathy that a separate scientific method, prescribed by an expert body, was being followed.The court observed that upon perusal of the materials available on record, it was seen that the petition was premature. There was no data before the court to compare and determine the correctness of the rankings. The court was not inclined to entertain the petition, it observed, adding that if the petitioner was aggrieved after the publication of the list, he might challenge it with the evidence.
