Follow:
- Next story MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.15959 of 2020 and WMP Nos.19856 & 19859 of 2020 K.S.Manoj (Minor)results and rank of the petitioner in NEET (UG) 2020 as 594 of 720 marks commensurate with his performance as reflected inIn view of the above, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to thoroughly consider the entire materials that have been placed by the petitioner and conduct an Investigation and a Report shall be filed before this Court. The Report must explain as to how two OMR Sheets containing the name of the petitioner was uploaded in the website and how it was completely in variance. It gives an opportunity to the 2nd respondent to plug the leak, if there is one.
- Previous story [12/10, 11:37] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1336915184913272832?s=08 [12/10, 11:37] Sekarreporter1: Plea challenging probe against Anna University VC: Madras high court impleads Surappa, transfers case to principal seat – Times of India https://t.co/SXJ7rKGlTO via @timesofindia
Recent Posts
- Inviting CJ/APP and DJ Aspirants . ONLINE /OFFLINE SUBJECT : The BNS 2023
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
More
Recent Posts
- Inviting CJ/APP and DJ Aspirants . ONLINE /OFFLINE SUBJECT : The BNS 2023
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
