[01/10, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) CTC 1 : subramanian R vs ICICI bank ltd chennai : Bankers book evidence act 1884 section 4 : Held when bank marked statement of accounts along with certificate under section 4 of bankers books evidence act , certificate need not be produced for each and every page of statement of accounts[01/10, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) CTC 263 : kaleur rahman vs P kannan : suit for bare injunction restraining the authorities from granting electricity connection falls within bar of section 145 of the electricity act 2003[01/10, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 1995 (1) RCR 613 ( DB ) : Niyamavedi vs Raman srivastava : Regarding persons alleged with offences affecting security of state , any citizen can bring to the notice of court that investigation is not proceeding in a proper manner[01/10, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 2019 (1) MLJ 163 : QD seatamon designs pvt ltd nungambakkam chennai vs P suresh : statement of law made by supreme court is declaration of law within meaning of art 141 of the constitution of india ,statement of law contained in precedent to be followed as matter of judicial discipline[01/10, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 1983 CRI LJ 722 : Gurcharan singh vs state of punjab : If an indivdual is able to urge a point , the decision of which will end the abuse of justice or can win freedom to a person illegally detained or threatened to be detained in such a manner the court is not to be influenced by the technicality of the objection as to locus standi to deny relief or refuse to go into the matter , the action of the court has to be conductive to the administration of justice