SEKAR REPORTER

[04/09, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) CTC 673 : R muthukrishnan vs union of india : Person cannot appear or plead before court of law in dual capacity , one as party and other as advocate , when an advocate is appearing as party – in – person he is bound to maintain norms and decorum of legal profession[04/09, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 1 SC : Harshad govardhan sondagar vs IARC ltd : A lease of secured asset made by borrower after he receives notice under section 13(2) of SARFASI act from secured creditor intending to enforce that secured asset will not be valid lease[04/09, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2011 (2) SCC 772 : TGN kumar vs state of kerala : In a proceedings regarding exemption from personal appearance of the accused , order of magistrate should be such which does not result in unnecessary harassment to accused and at the same time does not cause any prejudice to complainant[04/09, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2010(2) crimes 740 : state of HP vs dr Ravinder datyal ; Held for fixing criminal liability of a doctor or surgeon , the standard of negligence required to be proved should be so high as can be described as gross negligence or recklessness

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

[04/09, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) CTC 673 : R muthukrishnan vs union of india : Person cannot appear or plead before court of law in dual capacity , one as party and other as advocate , when an advocate is appearing as party – in – person he is bound to maintain norms and decorum of legal profession
[04/09, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 1 SC : Harshad govardhan sondagar vs IARC ltd : A lease of secured asset made by borrower after he receives notice under section 13(2) of SARFASI act from secured creditor intending to enforce that secured asset will not be valid lease
[04/09, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2011 (2) SCC 772 : TGN kumar vs state of kerala : In a proceedings regarding exemption from personal appearance of the accused , order of magistrate should be such which does not result in unnecessary harassment to accused and at the same time does not cause any prejudice to complainant
[04/09, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2010(2) crimes 740 : state of HP vs dr Ravinder datyal ; Held for fixing criminal liability of a doctor or surgeon , the standard of negligence required to be proved should be so high as can be described as gross negligence or recklessness

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Exit mobile version