Follow:
- Next story Excellent speech of vrsj in seradi Sai baba Bangalore
- Previous story Today tips When an appeal has been filed against a sentence passed under section 376, section 376A, section 376AB, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D, section 376DA, section 376DB or section 376E of the Indian Penal Code, (45 of 1860) such as sexual offences, the appeal shall be disposed of within a period of six months from the date of filing of such appeal. * CRPC – 374(4) when the appeal filed by accused. * CRPC – 377(4) when the appeal filed by the state government. By E.DURAIVAIYAPURI, ADVOCATE.
Recent Posts
- Inviting CJ/APP and DJ Aspirants . ONLINE /OFFLINE SUBJECT : The BNS 2023
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
More
Recent Posts
- Inviting CJ/APP and DJ Aspirants . ONLINE /OFFLINE SUBJECT : The BNS 2023
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
