Follow:
- Next story [1/2, 17:57] Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: ORDER XXI RULE 89 –
- Previous story Madras HC rejects plea to stall web series ‘Queen’
Recent Posts
- 5 lakhs fine MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Contempt Petition No.556 of 2024 and Sub Appl Nos.174, 175 of 2024 and 72 of 2025 Elephant G. Rajendran Advocate, Plot No.4, Door No.10/301, Anjaneyar Koil Street, Vengaivasal, Chennai 600 126. … Petitioner Versus Mr.Shiv Das Meena, IAS., The Chief Secrtary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 9. Mr.P.Amudha, I.A.S., The Home Secretary,
- Justices N Mala and G Arul Murugan issued the order, citing concerns over the large-scale violence that had erupted during a similar event organised by the party in
- Justices MS Ramesh and N Senthilkumar dismissed the convict’s appeal against the Mahila Court’s 2019 judgment, noting that
- Centre told the Division Bench of Justices J. Nisha Banu and S. Srimathy that a separate scientific method, prescribed by an expert body, was being followed.The court observed that upon perusal of the materials available on record, it was seen that the petition was premature. There was no data before the court to compare and determine the correctness of the rankings. The court was not inclined to entertain the petition, it observed, adding that if the petitioner was aggrieved after the publication of the list, he might challenge it with the evidence.
- Supreme Court on Friday pulled up an advocate, who represents an accused in the Tamil Nadu cash-for-jobs scam, for filing a plea purportedly on behalf of the victims of the same scam in which former minister Senthil Balaji is the prime accused.
More
Recent Posts
- 5 lakhs fine MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Contempt Petition No.556 of 2024 and Sub Appl Nos.174, 175 of 2024 and 72 of 2025 Elephant G. Rajendran Advocate, Plot No.4, Door No.10/301, Anjaneyar Koil Street, Vengaivasal, Chennai 600 126. … Petitioner Versus Mr.Shiv Das Meena, IAS., The Chief Secrtary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 9. Mr.P.Amudha, I.A.S., The Home Secretary,
- Justices N Mala and G Arul Murugan issued the order, citing concerns over the large-scale violence that had erupted during a similar event organised by the party in
- Justices MS Ramesh and N Senthilkumar dismissed the convict’s appeal against the Mahila Court’s 2019 judgment, noting that
- Centre told the Division Bench of Justices J. Nisha Banu and S. Srimathy that a separate scientific method, prescribed by an expert body, was being followed.The court observed that upon perusal of the materials available on record, it was seen that the petition was premature. There was no data before the court to compare and determine the correctness of the rankings. The court was not inclined to entertain the petition, it observed, adding that if the petitioner was aggrieved after the publication of the list, he might challenge it with the evidence.
- Supreme Court on Friday pulled up an advocate, who represents an accused in the Tamil Nadu cash-for-jobs scam, for filing a plea purportedly on behalf of the victims of the same scam in which former minister Senthil Balaji is the prime accused.
