You may also like...
-
Family case Full order of THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR C.M.A.No.2988 of 2021 R.Kalaiselvi. –We have no hesitation in concurring with the findings of the learned Family Court Judge. All the grounds raised by the learned counsel for the Appellant in the Appeal relates to the factum of proving the marriage and also to prove the marriage through conduct of the parties. The counsel for the Appellant also contended that the parties are living together from the year 2013 onwards. When the marriage has not been solemnized under any one of the enactments, even assuming that there was long and continuous cohabitation or the parties were living together will not give rise to a cause of action for filing an application for restitution of conjugal rights. Long cohabitation or living together will not confer upon the parties any legal right to raise a matrimonial dispute before the Family Court, unless their marriage has been solemnized in a manner known to law. In view of the above said facts, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 3, 2021
-
Protection of temple jewels, ornaments: HC seeks respons
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 10, 2020
-
Sivasankar baba bail case in sc full order
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 8, 2022