You may also like...
-
23.In the result, both these Criminal Original Petitions stand dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Order of stay granted by this Court by directing the Trial Court not to deliver the judgment, also stands vacated. 05.08.2022 Dua Internet : Yes To 1.Additional Superintendent of Police, CBI/EOW/Chennai. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Tirupur. RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Kumar, Senior Counsel for Mr.P.Jagadeesan For R1 : Mr.K.Srinivasan Special Public Prosecutor for CBI For R2 : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R3 to R5 : in Crl.O.P.No.10040 of 2022: No appearance Eadu.Radhakrishnan … Petitione
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 10, 2022
-
Family case Full order of THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR C.M.A.No.2988 of 2021 R.Kalaiselvi. –We have no hesitation in concurring with the findings of the learned Family Court Judge. All the grounds raised by the learned counsel for the Appellant in the Appeal relates to the factum of proving the marriage and also to prove the marriage through conduct of the parties. The counsel for the Appellant also contended that the parties are living together from the year 2013 onwards. When the marriage has not been solemnized under any one of the enactments, even assuming that there was long and continuous cohabitation or the parties were living together will not give rise to a cause of action for filing an application for restitution of conjugal rights. Long cohabitation or living together will not confer upon the parties any legal right to raise a matrimonial dispute before the Family Court, unless their marriage has been solemnized in a manner known to law. In view of the above said facts, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 3, 2021
-
After a lull of three years, the Madras high court will recommence on August 12 hearing on a plea moved by 21 DMK MLAs, including party president M K Stalin, challenging a privilege motion initiated against them for waving gutka packets in Tamil Nadu assembly. The first bench of Chief Justice AP Sahi and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy said that they would allot August 12 exclusively to hear the matter.
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 10, 2020