Follow:
- Next story [10/16, 17:37] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/By7pcg0jkiw [10/16, 17:39] Sekarreporter 1: Follow this link to join my WhatsApp group: https://chat.whatsapp.com/IHSRlM4XdqN5VSbM18CrPr
- Previous story Poornima Athi Lashmi: Legal Eagles Elites Presents MASTER SERIES – Online Intensive Coaching for CJ / DJ / APP – Aspirants / Advocates / Law Students Topic: THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 Date: 16.10.2022 Time: 06.30 p. m. Onwards
Recent Posts
- Justices N Mala and G Arul Murugan issued the order, citing concerns over the large-scale violence that had erupted during a similar event organised by the party in
- Justices MS Ramesh and N Senthilkumar dismissed the convict’s appeal against the Mahila Court’s 2019 judgment, noting that
- Centre told the Division Bench of Justices J. Nisha Banu and S. Srimathy that a separate scientific method, prescribed by an expert body, was being followed.The court observed that upon perusal of the materials available on record, it was seen that the petition was premature. There was no data before the court to compare and determine the correctness of the rankings. The court was not inclined to entertain the petition, it observed, adding that if the petitioner was aggrieved after the publication of the list, he might challenge it with the evidence.
- Supreme Court on Friday pulled up an advocate, who represents an accused in the Tamil Nadu cash-for-jobs scam, for filing a plea purportedly on behalf of the victims of the same scam in which former minister Senthil Balaji is the prime accused.
- Hcp order HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH ANDMR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR
More
Recent Posts
- Justices N Mala and G Arul Murugan issued the order, citing concerns over the large-scale violence that had erupted during a similar event organised by the party in
- Justices MS Ramesh and N Senthilkumar dismissed the convict’s appeal against the Mahila Court’s 2019 judgment, noting that
- Centre told the Division Bench of Justices J. Nisha Banu and S. Srimathy that a separate scientific method, prescribed by an expert body, was being followed.The court observed that upon perusal of the materials available on record, it was seen that the petition was premature. There was no data before the court to compare and determine the correctness of the rankings. The court was not inclined to entertain the petition, it observed, adding that if the petitioner was aggrieved after the publication of the list, he might challenge it with the evidence.
- Supreme Court on Friday pulled up an advocate, who represents an accused in the Tamil Nadu cash-for-jobs scam, for filing a plea purportedly on behalf of the victims of the same scam in which former minister Senthil Balaji is the prime accused.
- Hcp order HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH ANDMR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR
