[13/06, 10:09] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) CTC 639 : sidharth S vs P lalitha kumari : Power under order 38 rule 5 CPC 1908 is drastic and extraordinary , such power should not be exercised mechanically or merely for asking
[13/06, 10:09] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) CTC 263 : kaleur rahman vs P kannan : suit for bare injunction restraining the authorities from granting electricity connection falls within bar of section 145 of the electricity act 2003
[13/06, 10:09] Vinothpandian: 2009 (9) SCC 164 : mankamma vs state of kerala : when it is found that the evidence has been appreciated in a mechanical manner and without proper consideration of facts and circumstances on record , court in the interest of justice re – appreciate evidences
[13/06, 10:09] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) DRTC 303 : varun industries ltd vs indian bank : sec 20 RDDBFI act 1993 : DRT and DRAT has no power to confiscate passport or cannot direct to surrender passport ( DRAT – Mumbai )
[13/06, 10:09] Vinothpandian: 2016 (7) MLJ 419 : kedar nath yadav vs state of west bengal : determination of proper compensation pertaining to land acquisition cannot be considered in writ jurisdiction
[13/06, 10:09] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed ahmed vs karnataka bank ltd : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily.contain reasons