Follow:
- Next story [11/21, 19:02] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1726956515750519164?t=VqgJBzyjGJLSkUcTl3pWXg&s=08 [11/21, 19:02] sekarreporter1: in behalf of ugc asg ARL Sundaresan arguments# It was stated by the Madras University in the last hearing that they had not received grants from UGC. UGC had filed an affidavit setting out the details of grants released by UGC to Madras University on a regular basis. The Honble Chief Justice observed that from institutions of this level there should not be such statements. It was further argued that the nomination of UGC member in the search panel for VC was mandatory and MU and Govt of TN were bound by it. Chief bench At the end at the request of Learned AG case was adjourned
- Previous story Justice Kaul told the Attorney General, “You see what will happen at some stage is that we can’t let Judges, whom we think should not work in ‘A’ Court continue to work. Which will mean, again something which is not very pleasant, I will not like to say, and you understand the consequence. If it is driven to that, that is what will happen. It will embarrass those judges if we do that. I won’t like to do that because they have to go and work in some other Court. You understand the step which is in contemplation or which will happen. Please don’t let that happen. It will dilute the authority of those Judges, to work wherever they go, were we to take such a step”.
Recent Posts
- [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: Car race case heated arguments by senior adv PR Raman for gov ag argued for petner ragavachary argued bench RMDJ [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: 👍 [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: Car race case heated arguments by senior adv PR Raman for gov ag argued for petner ragavachary argued bench RMDJ [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: 👍 [12/11, 13:17] sekarreporter1: இது அரசின் கொள்கை முடிவு gov policy என்றார் ag [12/11, 13:17] sekarreporter1: [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: Car race case heated arguments by senior adv PR Raman for gov ag argued for petner ragavachary argued bench RMDJ [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: 👍 [12/11, 13:17] sekarreporter1: இது அரசின் கொள்கை முடிவு gov policy என்றார் ag [12/11, 13:22] sekarreporter1: Judge ask question அரசு பணம் செலவிடலாமா?
- மிக்ஜாம் புயல் பேங்கல போட்றங்க pil வழக்கு
- மிக்ஜாம் புயல் பணம் வங்கி கணக்கில் செலுத்தனுமாம் pil filed
- [12/11, 11:21] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/karthickselvaa/status/1734084919092203749?s=08 [12/11, 11:21] sekarreporter1: CJI : There are 3 judgments, one by the CJI for himself, Justice GAvai and Surya Kant, Justice Khanna in a separate one has concurred and Justice Kaul has authored a separate judgment. #SupremeCourt #Article370
- #Article370 | Supreme Court rejects the petitioners’ arguments that no irreversible action can be taken by Centre during President’s rule. Updates: ndtv.com/india-news/art…
More
Recent Posts
- [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: Car race case heated arguments by senior adv PR Raman for gov ag argued for petner ragavachary argued bench RMDJ [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: 👍 [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: Car race case heated arguments by senior adv PR Raman for gov ag argued for petner ragavachary argued bench RMDJ [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: 👍 [12/11, 13:17] sekarreporter1: இது அரசின் கொள்கை முடிவு gov policy என்றார் ag [12/11, 13:17] sekarreporter1: [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: Car race case heated arguments by senior adv PR Raman for gov ag argued for petner ragavachary argued bench RMDJ [12/11, 13:16] sekarreporter1: 👍 [12/11, 13:17] sekarreporter1: இது அரசின் கொள்கை முடிவு gov policy என்றார் ag [12/11, 13:22] sekarreporter1: Judge ask question அரசு பணம் செலவிடலாமா?
- மிக்ஜாம் புயல் பேங்கல போட்றங்க pil வழக்கு
- மிக்ஜாம் புயல் பணம் வங்கி கணக்கில் செலுத்தனுமாம் pil filed
- [12/11, 11:21] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/karthickselvaa/status/1734084919092203749?s=08 [12/11, 11:21] sekarreporter1: CJI : There are 3 judgments, one by the CJI for himself, Justice GAvai and Surya Kant, Justice Khanna in a separate one has concurred and Justice Kaul has authored a separate judgment. #SupremeCourt #Article370
- #Article370 | Supreme Court rejects the petitioners’ arguments that no irreversible action can be taken by Centre during President’s rule. Updates: ndtv.com/india-news/art…