Follow:
- Next story https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1726966660555579585?t=uN__9xbgbZFI4gptZDTGLw&s=08 HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA W.P.No.31458 of 2023 & W.M.P. Nos. 31077, 31079 & 31082 of 2023 Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees’ Federation, Represented by its General Secretary, In the result, the Writ Petition is allowed except for the fourth prayer for criminal prosecution against the respondents 5, 6 and 10 as the same is unwarranted and is dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. The tender notice dated 30.09.2023 in Tender Document No.63/ 14563/ NA2/ MTC/ 2023 is set aside. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ajoy Khose For R1 to R4 : Mr.D. Gopal, Government Advocate For R5 : Mr. R.Ramanlal, Additional Advocate General IV Assisted by Mr.A.Vinoth Raj Standing Counsel. For R6 : Mr.L.S.M. Hasan Fizal, Additional Government Pleader Standing Counsel for SETC For R7 : Ms. P.S. Pavithra For R8 : Mr. M. Aswin For R9 : Mr. A. Sundaravadhanan For R10 : Mr. M. Murali Vinodh For R11&R12 : Mr. C. Gauthamaraj ORDER
- Previous story [11/21, 19:02] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1726956515750519164?t=VqgJBzyjGJLSkUcTl3pWXg&s=08 [11/21, 19:02] sekarreporter1: in behalf of ugc asg ARL Sundaresan arguments# It was stated by the Madras University in the last hearing that they had not received grants from UGC. UGC had filed an affidavit setting out the details of grants released by UGC to Madras University on a regular basis. The Honble Chief Justice observed that from institutions of this level there should not be such statements. It was further argued that the nomination of UGC member in the search panel for VC was mandatory and MU and Govt of TN were bound by it. Chief bench At the end at the request of Learned AG case was adjourned
Recent Posts
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIW. P.No. 25446 of 2021andW.M.P.No.26886 of 2021Dhanraj Baid Jain College,(Institution of Tamil Nadu Educational & Medical Trust),
- THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYW.P.No.27875 of 2024& W.M.P.No.30397 of 2024/Upon production of proof with regard to the payment as stated above, the concerned Appellate Authority shall consider and dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law, by providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, without pressing for limitation. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
- this year, Srinivasan filed a civil suit against the Madras Music Academy,
- vacation bench of Justice PB Balaji and Justice G Arul Murugan heard the PIL moved by T Vennila, from Chennai. The petitioner contended that in the past four years unskilled field workers have lost their lives in Tangedco solely because they were made to perform tasks that they were neither recruited for nor trained to do the tasks. Apart from these 70 fatalities, there have been recurrent life-altering accidents, wherein over a 100 victims have been physically disabled, she said.
- The Madras High Court presided over by Justice Lakshminarayanan ruled in favour of Sindhuja setting aside the earlier order of the Family Court. The High Court directed the family welfare court to determine appropriate compensation for Sindhuja, emphasising that under Section 18 of the Domestic Violence Act, the victim’s protection must come first.
More
Recent Posts
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIW. P.No. 25446 of 2021andW.M.P.No.26886 of 2021Dhanraj Baid Jain College,(Institution of Tamil Nadu Educational & Medical Trust),
- THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYW.P.No.27875 of 2024& W.M.P.No.30397 of 2024/Upon production of proof with regard to the payment as stated above, the concerned Appellate Authority shall consider and dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law, by providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, without pressing for limitation. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
- this year, Srinivasan filed a civil suit against the Madras Music Academy,
- vacation bench of Justice PB Balaji and Justice G Arul Murugan heard the PIL moved by T Vennila, from Chennai. The petitioner contended that in the past four years unskilled field workers have lost their lives in Tangedco solely because they were made to perform tasks that they were neither recruited for nor trained to do the tasks. Apart from these 70 fatalities, there have been recurrent life-altering accidents, wherein over a 100 victims have been physically disabled, she said.
- The Madras High Court presided over by Justice Lakshminarayanan ruled in favour of Sindhuja setting aside the earlier order of the Family Court. The High Court directed the family welfare court to determine appropriate compensation for Sindhuja, emphasising that under Section 18 of the Domestic Violence Act, the victim’s protection must come first.