[12/08, 11:07] Vinothpandian: AIR 2018 SC 4647 : Achpal @ Ramswaroop vs state of Rajasthan : Return of charge sheet due to technical fault , appellants are entitled to be admitted to bail in terms of section 167(2) of CRPC[12/08, 11:07] Vinothpandian: 2013(1) SCC 177 : MSR leathers vs S palaniappan : prosecution based upon second or successive dishonour of cheque is permissible so long as the same satisfies the requirements stipulated in the proviso to sec 138 NI act[12/08, 11:07] Vinothpandian: AIR 2009 SC 3191 : Dalip kaur vs jagnar singh : breach of contract of an agreement for sale would not constitute an offence under sec 406 or 420 IPC[12/08, 11:07] Vinothpandian: 2008(1) crimes 165 : suryalakshmi cotton mills ltd vs Rajvir industries ltd : commercial expediencies may lead a person to issue blank cheques and filling up of blanks in a cheque itself would not amount to forgery or cheating[12/08, 11:07] Vinothpandian: 2014 (4) crimes 164 : Gul singh @ Guliya vs state of MP : Evidence of child witness cannot be rejected unless the same is tutored or unless the same is unreliable[12/08, 11:07] Vinothpandian: 2019(1) LRC ( SC ) : satish chandra Ratanlal shah vs state of gujarat : mere inability of appellant to return loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the begining of the transaction[12/08, 11:07] Vinothpandian: 2014 (10) SCC 658 : state of Rajasthan vs mohammad muslim Tagala : court cannot direct appropriate government to exercise its soverign powers , court can merely give a direction to appropriate government to consider the case for commutation of sentence and nothing more[12/08, 11:07] Vinothpandian: 2018(1) SCC 638 : B sunitha vs state of Telengana : fee claimed by an Advocate on percentage basis cannot be the basis of a complaint under section 138 of the NI act