You may also like...
-
Justice K. Murali Shankar observed that during COVID-19 pandemic, the entire country was working virtually. Since the petitioner had not raised any objection before the trial court, he should not take such a stand before the High Court. The Supreme Court had permitted virtual hearing and the High Court had issued various circulars to conduct the cases virtually in view of the pandemic. The complaint that the petitioner was not given an opportunity to argue the case elaborately physically was very much against the orders of the Supreme Court and the High Court, the judge said
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 12, 2021
-
Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1582352750134071296?t=YjZ7_m3x5nLDlnxGzwvA3g&s=08 [10/18, 18:18] Sekarreporter 1: [10/18, 18:16] Kirubakaran J: When I got enrolled on 4-09-1985, Mr.R.K was the Advocate General.it was during MGR Rule. Subsequently also he was made Advocate General of the State during Ms Jayalalitha’s regime. He was a towering Personality and respected Senior Advocate by the Judiciary and the Legal Fraternity.
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 18, 2022
-
Learned Judge pt asha j had clearly held that the fundamental premise, on which, the Hindu Law of Adoptions proceeds is that the relationship between the biological parents and the children can never get severed, except in accordance with the provisions of this Act
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 17, 2020