[2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2016(5) CTC 746 : Ayyasamy A vs A paramasivam : ” fraud is knowing misrepresentation of truth or concealment of material fact to induce another to act to his detriment [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2014(4) CTC 315 : Rajagopalan vs Gnanapandithan : Held non _ issuance of reply or counter affidavit by itself is not ground for allowing applications [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2016(4) CTC 92 : Axis bank vs SBS organics Pvt Ltd : SARFASi act 2002 sec 18 : Held pre – deposit made by borrower with tribunal would not empower bank to claim general lien ,banker cannot exercise right of general lien against pre – deposit amount deposited by borrower [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2013(1)CTC 931 SC : deputy inspector general of police vs S.Samuthiram : service law : mere acquittal of employee by criminal court has no impact on disciplinary proceedings initiated by employer ,punishment of dismissal of service cannot be interfered [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: AIR 2017 SC 1432 : Sasi vs Aravindakshan Nair : An application for review has to be disposed of as expeditiously as possible [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: AIR 1982 MP 8 : jairam vs jagatram : ignorance of law if pleaded is no ground for condonation of delay
[2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2016(5) CTC 746 : Ayyasamy A vs A paramasivam : ” fraud is knowing misrepresentation of truth or concealment of material fact to induce another to act to his detriment
[2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2014(4) CTC 315 : Rajagopalan vs Gnanapandithan : Held non _ issuance of reply or counter affidavit by itself is not ground for allowing applications
[2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2016(4) CTC 92 : Axis bank vs SBS organics Pvt Ltd : SARFASi act 2002 sec 18 : Held pre – deposit made by borrower with tribunal would not empower bank to claim general lien ,banker cannot exercise right of general lien against pre – deposit amount deposited by borrower
[2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2013(1)CTC 931 SC : deputy inspector general of police vs S.Samuthiram : service law : mere acquittal of employee by criminal court has no impact on disciplinary proceedings initiated by employer ,punishment of dismissal of service cannot be interfered
[2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: AIR 2017 SC 1432 : Sasi vs Aravindakshan Nair : An application for review has to be disposed of as expeditiously as possible
[2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: AIR 1982 MP 8 : jairam vs jagatram : ignorance of law if pleaded is no ground for condonation of delay
