[23/09, 10:39] Vinothpandian: 2018(7) MLJ 1 : ( DB) : Royal bank of Scotland vs Dr TD Naidu : bankers books evidence act section 4 : statement of account speaks for itself ,there is no need for witness to have any personal knowledge on entries made therein[23/09, 10:39] Vinothpandian: 2019(16) SCC 407 : R muthukrishnan vs high court of judicature at madras : In a case where the bar council is not taking appropriate action against the advocate ,it would be open to the high court to entertain the writ petition and to issue appropriate directions to the bar council to take action in accordance with the law in the discharge of duties enjoined upon it[23/09, 10:39] Vinothpandian: 2017(1) crimes SC 203 : dr Rini Johar & anr vs state of MP : Pertaining to allegation of violation of procedures of arrest and curtailment of liberty ,initiation of disciplinary proceedings or criminal prosecution should not be an impediment for delineation of the allegations[23/09, 10:39] Vinothpandian: 2019(2) RCR ( criminal ) 145 : satish chandra Ratanlal shah vs state of Gujarat : courts should restrain from making general observations at initial stage of criminal proceedings as they may have had a bearing on the adjudication of the trial[23/09, 10:39] Vinothpandian: 2015(1) crimes 794 ( pat ) : Raj Kapoor Ram and others vs state of Bihar : any statement made in any bail application filed on behalf of accused cannot be used against him as evidence