Follow:
- Next story The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court has held that Electropathy/ Electro Homeopathy system of medicine cannot be allowed to propel, as the same is not recognized under any law in India. Dismissing a batch of petitions filed by practitioners in Electropathy, Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana held, “Most of the certificates produced by the petitioners in the typed set of papers, in respect of their claim of obtaining Diploma in Electro Homeopathy, are issued by some private institutions without affiliation to anyone of the statutory bodies / universities recognized by the Acts of the Parliament. The petitioners, who claimed to have undergone a diploma course in the so-called alternative stream of medicine, without even verifying the genuineness of the statutory recognition, status of the institute joined the course, throws serious doubt about the genuineness in their very claim. Having obtained diplomas from such institutes, the petitioners are estopped from claiming any right either to register themselves in the roles of the statutory council or practice in that particular stream of medicine.”
- Previous story Bar council chairman interview regarding ipatribunal not shifting chennai to delhi
Recent Posts
- Income Tax Assessee Who Failed To Avail Option To Request Personal Hearing Can’t Claim That Personal Hearing Was Not Provided: Madras HC
- Family court case THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANANC.R.P. No.1406 of 2024
- Tangedco case நீதிபதிகள் பி.பி. பாலாஜி, ஜி.அருள் முருகன் அமர்வில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தபோது,மனுதாரர் தரப்பில் வழக்கறிஞர் எம் வேல்முருகன் ஆஜராகி வாதிட்டார்.
- Gst case full order / show cause notice order to reply /THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMARandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW. P.No.28060 of 2019andW.M.P.No.27677 of 2019Harris Jayaraj,
- Vallalar case full order W.P.Nos.9141, 8190, 13325 and 29630 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.32281 and 32282 of 2024R.SURESH KUMAR, J and S.SOUNTHAR, J(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESHKUMAR, J)Except W.P.No.29630 of 2024, all other three writ petitions have already been heard and successive interim orders have been passed by this Court. Last such order was passed by us on 19.09.2024, where interalia we have passed the following order :
More
Recent Posts
- Income Tax Assessee Who Failed To Avail Option To Request Personal Hearing Can’t Claim That Personal Hearing Was Not Provided: Madras HC
- Family court case THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANANC.R.P. No.1406 of 2024
- Tangedco case நீதிபதிகள் பி.பி. பாலாஜி, ஜி.அருள் முருகன் அமர்வில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தபோது,மனுதாரர் தரப்பில் வழக்கறிஞர் எம் வேல்முருகன் ஆஜராகி வாதிட்டார்.
- Gst case full order / show cause notice order to reply /THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMARandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW. P.No.28060 of 2019andW.M.P.No.27677 of 2019Harris Jayaraj,
- Vallalar case full order W.P.Nos.9141, 8190, 13325 and 29630 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.32281 and 32282 of 2024R.SURESH KUMAR, J and S.SOUNTHAR, J(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESHKUMAR, J)Except W.P.No.29630 of 2024, all other three writ petitions have already been heard and successive interim orders have been passed by this Court. Last such order was passed by us on 19.09.2024, where interalia we have passed the following order :