Follow:
- Next story Therefore, we do not render our findings on the other contentions raised by the parties on merits of the impugned orders as we deem it fit to dismiss the Writ Petition with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal as per Section 62 of the IBC before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and agitate all the grounds raised therein. However, there shall be no orders as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (T.R., ACJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 01.02.2023 Index : yes Speaking order Neutral Citation : yes grs T.RAJA, ACJ., AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. 1. IDBI Bank Limited Represented by Mrs.K.Bhoomalakshmi General Manager 2. Insolvency Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) Represented by Deputy General Manager 3. Indian Institute of Insolvency Professionals of ICAI (IIIPI) Represented by Managing Director … Respondents
- Previous story fresh acquisition can be made for distributing the land for the 37 beneficiaries already identified by the respondents. Therefore, it is left open to State to take a final call on the liberty given to them in the impugned order. 15. Thus, we find no merits in the Writ Appeal and accordingly W.A.No.2632 of 2022 is dismissed. There is no order as to Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (T.R.,A.C.J.) (D.B.C, J.) 23.03.2023 Index : yes Speaking order Neutral citation : yes klt To 1. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Adhi Dravidar Welfare Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Villupuram, Villupuram District. 3. The District Adhi Dravidar Welfare Officer, Villupuram, Villupuram District. 4. The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition & Adhi Dravidar Welfare, Gingee, Villupuram District. THE HON’BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J., klt Pre-Delivery Judgment in W.A.No.2632 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.21067 of 2022 23.03.2023 gp muthu kumar
Recent Posts
- Criminal Malicious prosecution initiated against veteran director Kastooriraja father of actor Dhanush by financier Gagan Bothra for having roped him in a false case.The case pertain to a loan availed by him in 2012 to the tune of ₹65lakhs from late Cine financier Bothra. To discharge that loan, Kastooriraja issued cheques which got dishonoured and late Bothra had filed 138 case and civil suit before high court. During the pendency of those cases, Kastooriraja filed private complaint alleging that blank cheques given by him were misused by Mukanchand Bothra and his son gagan Bothra and initiated private complaint before Vlll MM George Town court. The said case was subsequently quashed by Justice Dandapani on the ground that Kastooriraja has purposely inorder to harass gagan Bothra has filed a private complaint.Based on that Gagan Bothra insisted private complaint for malicious prosecution and compensation of one crore before the Vllll MM at Georgetown and the learned magistrate took prima facie cognisance and issued summons to the accused Kastooriraja and directed him to appear personally on 15-11-2024.
- Flagpoles case/THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMARW.P. No.30350 of 2024Shyam Kumar … PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government,Revenue Department,Government of Tamilnadu,Secretariat,
- ground breaking ceremony in sc chief justice function live
- The Petitioner runs a proprietorship under the name and style CyberX9. They provide cyber security services and have a rich clientele. The Petitioner is also a customer of Star Health insurance Company. Star Health is one of the largest collectors of data of its customers and stores them online through its servers. While doing research on their cyber security, the Petitioner found that there were vulnerabilities in the cyber security of Star Health and the personal data of lot of customers were accessible through the same without the necessity of login and password. The information that was available were the policy details, bank account details, Aadhar card number and other personal information of the customers. The customers include high ranking government officials, politicians, members of the judiciary and other high net worth individuals.
- Senior Advocate Srinath Sridevan, representing Pathak, urged the Court to direct the Union government to initiate an investigation into the incident. However, the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information stated that the inquiry should be conducted by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA), not the Central government.
More
Recent Posts
- Criminal Malicious prosecution initiated against veteran director Kastooriraja father of actor Dhanush by financier Gagan Bothra for having roped him in a false case.The case pertain to a loan availed by him in 2012 to the tune of ₹65lakhs from late Cine financier Bothra. To discharge that loan, Kastooriraja issued cheques which got dishonoured and late Bothra had filed 138 case and civil suit before high court. During the pendency of those cases, Kastooriraja filed private complaint alleging that blank cheques given by him were misused by Mukanchand Bothra and his son gagan Bothra and initiated private complaint before Vlll MM George Town court. The said case was subsequently quashed by Justice Dandapani on the ground that Kastooriraja has purposely inorder to harass gagan Bothra has filed a private complaint.Based on that Gagan Bothra insisted private complaint for malicious prosecution and compensation of one crore before the Vllll MM at Georgetown and the learned magistrate took prima facie cognisance and issued summons to the accused Kastooriraja and directed him to appear personally on 15-11-2024.
- Flagpoles case/THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMARW.P. No.30350 of 2024Shyam Kumar … PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government,Revenue Department,Government of Tamilnadu,Secretariat,
- ground breaking ceremony in sc chief justice function live
- The Petitioner runs a proprietorship under the name and style CyberX9. They provide cyber security services and have a rich clientele. The Petitioner is also a customer of Star Health insurance Company. Star Health is one of the largest collectors of data of its customers and stores them online through its servers. While doing research on their cyber security, the Petitioner found that there were vulnerabilities in the cyber security of Star Health and the personal data of lot of customers were accessible through the same without the necessity of login and password. The information that was available were the policy details, bank account details, Aadhar card number and other personal information of the customers. The customers include high ranking government officials, politicians, members of the judiciary and other high net worth individuals.
- Senior Advocate Srinath Sridevan, representing Pathak, urged the Court to direct the Union government to initiate an investigation into the incident. However, the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information stated that the inquiry should be conducted by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA), not the Central government.