Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH WP.Nos.10332 & 10333 of 2016 and WMP.Nos.9136 & 9137 of 2016 WP.No.10332 of 2016 M/s.Victor Guedes Industria E.Commercio S.A. A company incorporated under the laws of Portugal And having office at Largo Monterroio Mascarenhas #1, 1070-184 Lisboa Portugal Rep. herein by its Authorised Signatory Govardhan Gajjal … Petitioner Vs 1.The Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks Trade Mark Office Anna Salai, Guindy Industrial Estate Guindy, Chennai-600 032. 2.M/s.Galla Foods Pvt. Ltd. No.12, Kodambakkam High Road Chennai-600 034. … Respondents PR. Writ dismissed
- Previous story THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH WP.No.2880 of 2015 and MP.No.1 of 2015 Shanthi … Petitioner A transfer of the matter at this juncture is unnecessary and pre-mature apart from leading to an inference that the Court concerned would not hear the petitioner’s objection fully or fairly. This Court finds no reason to draw such an inference or voice such apprehension.
Recent Posts
- Criminal Malicious prosecution initiated against veteran director Kastooriraja father of actor Dhanush by financier Gagan Bothra for having roped him in a false case.The case pertain to a loan availed by him in 2012 to the tune of ₹65lakhs from late Cine financier Bothra. To discharge that loan, Kastooriraja issued cheques which got dishonoured and late Bothra had filed 138 case and civil suit before high court. During the pendency of those cases, Kastooriraja filed private complaint alleging that blank cheques given by him were misused by Mukanchand Bothra and his son gagan Bothra and initiated private complaint before Vlll MM George Town court. The said case was subsequently quashed by Justice Dandapani on the ground that Kastooriraja has purposely inorder to harass gagan Bothra has filed a private complaint.Based on that Gagan Bothra insisted private complaint for malicious prosecution and compensation of one crore before the Vllll MM at Georgetown and the learned magistrate took prima facie cognisance and issued summons to the accused Kastooriraja and directed him to appear personally on 15-11-2024.
- Flagpoles case/THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMARW.P. No.30350 of 2024Shyam Kumar … PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government,Revenue Department,Government of Tamilnadu,Secretariat,
- ground breaking ceremony in sc chief justice function live
- The Petitioner runs a proprietorship under the name and style CyberX9. They provide cyber security services and have a rich clientele. The Petitioner is also a customer of Star Health insurance Company. Star Health is one of the largest collectors of data of its customers and stores them online through its servers. While doing research on their cyber security, the Petitioner found that there were vulnerabilities in the cyber security of Star Health and the personal data of lot of customers were accessible through the same without the necessity of login and password. The information that was available were the policy details, bank account details, Aadhar card number and other personal information of the customers. The customers include high ranking government officials, politicians, members of the judiciary and other high net worth individuals.
- Senior Advocate Srinath Sridevan, representing Pathak, urged the Court to direct the Union government to initiate an investigation into the incident. However, the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information stated that the inquiry should be conducted by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA), not the Central government.
More
Recent Posts
- Criminal Malicious prosecution initiated against veteran director Kastooriraja father of actor Dhanush by financier Gagan Bothra for having roped him in a false case.The case pertain to a loan availed by him in 2012 to the tune of ₹65lakhs from late Cine financier Bothra. To discharge that loan, Kastooriraja issued cheques which got dishonoured and late Bothra had filed 138 case and civil suit before high court. During the pendency of those cases, Kastooriraja filed private complaint alleging that blank cheques given by him were misused by Mukanchand Bothra and his son gagan Bothra and initiated private complaint before Vlll MM George Town court. The said case was subsequently quashed by Justice Dandapani on the ground that Kastooriraja has purposely inorder to harass gagan Bothra has filed a private complaint.Based on that Gagan Bothra insisted private complaint for malicious prosecution and compensation of one crore before the Vllll MM at Georgetown and the learned magistrate took prima facie cognisance and issued summons to the accused Kastooriraja and directed him to appear personally on 15-11-2024.
- Flagpoles case/THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMARW.P. No.30350 of 2024Shyam Kumar … PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government,Revenue Department,Government of Tamilnadu,Secretariat,
- ground breaking ceremony in sc chief justice function live
- The Petitioner runs a proprietorship under the name and style CyberX9. They provide cyber security services and have a rich clientele. The Petitioner is also a customer of Star Health insurance Company. Star Health is one of the largest collectors of data of its customers and stores them online through its servers. While doing research on their cyber security, the Petitioner found that there were vulnerabilities in the cyber security of Star Health and the personal data of lot of customers were accessible through the same without the necessity of login and password. The information that was available were the policy details, bank account details, Aadhar card number and other personal information of the customers. The customers include high ranking government officials, politicians, members of the judiciary and other high net worth individuals.
- Senior Advocate Srinath Sridevan, representing Pathak, urged the Court to direct the Union government to initiate an investigation into the incident. However, the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information stated that the inquiry should be conducted by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA), not the Central government.