Follow:
- Next story காமாட்சி சுவாமிநாதன் ஆட்டிசக் குழந்தைகளுக்கு அம்மா! ‘ஆட்டிசம் மாதிரி, மூளைச்செயல்திறன் பாதிக்கப்பட்ட பிள்ளைகளோட பிரச்னைகளை நம் மக்கள் இன்னும் புரிஞ்சுக்கவேயில்லை தம்பி. வீட்ல இருக்கிற மற்ற உறவுகளேகூட கைவிட்டுடுறாங்க. அம்மாக்கள் மட்டும்தான் அந்தப் பிள்ளைகளோட நம்பிக்கை.
- Previous story [3/3, 07:24] sekarreporter1: Advertisement Home இந்தியா PrevNext வெளியே போங்கள் மூத்த வழக்கறிஞரிடம் கொதித்த தலைமை நீதிபதி மா… Read more at: https://m.dinamalar.com/detail.php?id=3256308 [3/3, 10:26] sekarreporter1: .
Recent Posts
- நீதிபதி என் செந்தில்குமார் MRC Case golf ground
- 50 கோடி ரூபாய் சொத்தை மீட்ட நடிகர் கவுண்டமணி!
- PBBJ AMj தொடர் போராட்டத்தில் ஈடுபட்டு வந்த, சாம்சங் தொழிலாளர்கள் கைது செய்யப்பட்ட விவகாரம்
- Shamima Begum, the schoolgirl who left the UK to join Islamic State in Syria, has lost the latest round of her legal battle with the Home Office over its decision to remove her British citizenship.
- [09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2007 (5) SCC 228 : N Devindrappa vs state of karnataka : An act can result in both civil and criminal liability , merely in this case , act of the litigant has civil liability that does not mean that it cannot have criminal liability also[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2001 (1) CPR 51 : mehsana agro auto machines pvt ltd vs baldevbhai M patel : late delivery of vehicle by the dealer on account of late delivery by the manufacturer , interest on amount deposited till date of delivery @ 15% allowed[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2011 CRI LJ 3506 : Rajesh gutta vs state of AP : In a matrimonial proceeding initiated by wife as to cruelty wherein place of occurence is outside India , magistrate taking cognizance in india without obtaining sanction of central government is bad in law[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2002 (1) CPR 207 : gwalior ice factory vs MP electricity board : Excessive electricity bill settled by electricity board , remedy to claim interest on excessive deposit could not be availed from consumer forum[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 468 : varun pahwa vs Renu chaudhary : Power to grant amendment of pleadings is intended to serve ends of justice and not governed by narrow technical limitations ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )
More
Recent Posts
- நீதிபதி என் செந்தில்குமார் MRC Case golf ground
- 50 கோடி ரூபாய் சொத்தை மீட்ட நடிகர் கவுண்டமணி!
- PBBJ AMj தொடர் போராட்டத்தில் ஈடுபட்டு வந்த, சாம்சங் தொழிலாளர்கள் கைது செய்யப்பட்ட விவகாரம்
- Shamima Begum, the schoolgirl who left the UK to join Islamic State in Syria, has lost the latest round of her legal battle with the Home Office over its decision to remove her British citizenship.
- [09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2007 (5) SCC 228 : N Devindrappa vs state of karnataka : An act can result in both civil and criminal liability , merely in this case , act of the litigant has civil liability that does not mean that it cannot have criminal liability also[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2001 (1) CPR 51 : mehsana agro auto machines pvt ltd vs baldevbhai M patel : late delivery of vehicle by the dealer on account of late delivery by the manufacturer , interest on amount deposited till date of delivery @ 15% allowed[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2011 CRI LJ 3506 : Rajesh gutta vs state of AP : In a matrimonial proceeding initiated by wife as to cruelty wherein place of occurence is outside India , magistrate taking cognizance in india without obtaining sanction of central government is bad in law[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2002 (1) CPR 207 : gwalior ice factory vs MP electricity board : Excessive electricity bill settled by electricity board , remedy to claim interest on excessive deposit could not be availed from consumer forum[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 468 : varun pahwa vs Renu chaudhary : Power to grant amendment of pleadings is intended to serve ends of justice and not governed by narrow technical limitations ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )