Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN Crl.O.P.No.1834 of 2023 S.Elred Kumar Vs. M/s.City Union Bank Ltd., Represented by its Chief Manager, In the case before hand, petitioner without approaching the Presiding Officer of Debt Recovery Tribunal-II for the alleged commission of offence under Section 192 and 193 IPC straight away approached this Court for the relief of initiating criminal prosecution under Section 195(1)(b) r/w 340(1) Cr.P.C against the respondent for producing false evidence, which is against the law. Therefore, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
- Previous story Manikumar chief justice of kerala high court farewell speech
Recent Posts
- நீதிபதி என் செந்தில்குமார் MRC Case golf ground
- 50 கோடி ரூபாய் சொத்தை மீட்ட நடிகர் கவுண்டமணி!
- PBBJ AMj தொடர் போராட்டத்தில் ஈடுபட்டு வந்த, சாம்சங் தொழிலாளர்கள் கைது செய்யப்பட்ட விவகாரம்
- Shamima Begum, the schoolgirl who left the UK to join Islamic State in Syria, has lost the latest round of her legal battle with the Home Office over its decision to remove her British citizenship.
- [09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2007 (5) SCC 228 : N Devindrappa vs state of karnataka : An act can result in both civil and criminal liability , merely in this case , act of the litigant has civil liability that does not mean that it cannot have criminal liability also[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2001 (1) CPR 51 : mehsana agro auto machines pvt ltd vs baldevbhai M patel : late delivery of vehicle by the dealer on account of late delivery by the manufacturer , interest on amount deposited till date of delivery @ 15% allowed[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2011 CRI LJ 3506 : Rajesh gutta vs state of AP : In a matrimonial proceeding initiated by wife as to cruelty wherein place of occurence is outside India , magistrate taking cognizance in india without obtaining sanction of central government is bad in law[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2002 (1) CPR 207 : gwalior ice factory vs MP electricity board : Excessive electricity bill settled by electricity board , remedy to claim interest on excessive deposit could not be availed from consumer forum[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 468 : varun pahwa vs Renu chaudhary : Power to grant amendment of pleadings is intended to serve ends of justice and not governed by narrow technical limitations ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )
More
Recent Posts
- நீதிபதி என் செந்தில்குமார் MRC Case golf ground
- 50 கோடி ரூபாய் சொத்தை மீட்ட நடிகர் கவுண்டமணி!
- PBBJ AMj தொடர் போராட்டத்தில் ஈடுபட்டு வந்த, சாம்சங் தொழிலாளர்கள் கைது செய்யப்பட்ட விவகாரம்
- Shamima Begum, the schoolgirl who left the UK to join Islamic State in Syria, has lost the latest round of her legal battle with the Home Office over its decision to remove her British citizenship.
- [09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2007 (5) SCC 228 : N Devindrappa vs state of karnataka : An act can result in both civil and criminal liability , merely in this case , act of the litigant has civil liability that does not mean that it cannot have criminal liability also[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2001 (1) CPR 51 : mehsana agro auto machines pvt ltd vs baldevbhai M patel : late delivery of vehicle by the dealer on account of late delivery by the manufacturer , interest on amount deposited till date of delivery @ 15% allowed[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2011 CRI LJ 3506 : Rajesh gutta vs state of AP : In a matrimonial proceeding initiated by wife as to cruelty wherein place of occurence is outside India , magistrate taking cognizance in india without obtaining sanction of central government is bad in law[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2002 (1) CPR 207 : gwalior ice factory vs MP electricity board : Excessive electricity bill settled by electricity board , remedy to claim interest on excessive deposit could not be availed from consumer forum[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 468 : varun pahwa vs Renu chaudhary : Power to grant amendment of pleadings is intended to serve ends of justice and not governed by narrow technical limitations ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )