Follow:
- Next story [2/22, 17:01] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHC has directed a Tahsildar to cut a coconut tree grown by a house owner within his compound. The reason is that the tree is leaning over a tiled roof house next door & the naturally falling coconuts/dry branches are damaging the tiles. @THChennai [2/22, 17:01] sekarreporter1: HamberMenu HOME NEWS INDIA TAMIL NADU Madras High Court directs Tahsildar to cut coconut tree leaning over house next door, in Mayiladuthurai The house owner had complained to the court that the coconuts and dry branches falling from the tree were damaging his roof tiles frequently; despite appeals to the neighbour and the district administration, the tree had not been cut down February 22, 2023 03:37 pm | Updated 04:07 pm IST – CHENNAI MOHAMED IMRANULLAH S. COMMENTSSHAREREAD LATER File photograph used for representational purposes only File photograph used for representational purposes only | Photo Credit: ASHOK R C. Vinoth Kumar of Kuthalam taluk in Mayiladuthurai district, had a problem with his neighbour’s coconut tree, planted close to the compound wall, leaning over his tiled roof and causing frequent damage to the tiles. He moved the Madras High Court and obtained an order for the tree to be cut. A resident of Om Kaleeswarar Sannidhi Street, Mr. Kumar filed a writ petition in the High Court complaining of the coconuts and dry branches, falling from his neighbour’s coconut tree, causing damage to the roof’s tiles. He claimed to have been suffering losses and mental agony due to
- Previous story Madras High Court convicts its court officer for taking bribe from illiterate man on false promise of securing job
Recent Posts
- நீதிபதி என் செந்தில்குமார் MRC Case golf ground
- 50 கோடி ரூபாய் சொத்தை மீட்ட நடிகர் கவுண்டமணி!
- PBBJ AMj தொடர் போராட்டத்தில் ஈடுபட்டு வந்த, சாம்சங் தொழிலாளர்கள் கைது செய்யப்பட்ட விவகாரம்
- Shamima Begum, the schoolgirl who left the UK to join Islamic State in Syria, has lost the latest round of her legal battle with the Home Office over its decision to remove her British citizenship.
- [09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2007 (5) SCC 228 : N Devindrappa vs state of karnataka : An act can result in both civil and criminal liability , merely in this case , act of the litigant has civil liability that does not mean that it cannot have criminal liability also[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2001 (1) CPR 51 : mehsana agro auto machines pvt ltd vs baldevbhai M patel : late delivery of vehicle by the dealer on account of late delivery by the manufacturer , interest on amount deposited till date of delivery @ 15% allowed[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2011 CRI LJ 3506 : Rajesh gutta vs state of AP : In a matrimonial proceeding initiated by wife as to cruelty wherein place of occurence is outside India , magistrate taking cognizance in india without obtaining sanction of central government is bad in law[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2002 (1) CPR 207 : gwalior ice factory vs MP electricity board : Excessive electricity bill settled by electricity board , remedy to claim interest on excessive deposit could not be availed from consumer forum[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 468 : varun pahwa vs Renu chaudhary : Power to grant amendment of pleadings is intended to serve ends of justice and not governed by narrow technical limitations ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )
More
Recent Posts
- நீதிபதி என் செந்தில்குமார் MRC Case golf ground
- 50 கோடி ரூபாய் சொத்தை மீட்ட நடிகர் கவுண்டமணி!
- PBBJ AMj தொடர் போராட்டத்தில் ஈடுபட்டு வந்த, சாம்சங் தொழிலாளர்கள் கைது செய்யப்பட்ட விவகாரம்
- Shamima Begum, the schoolgirl who left the UK to join Islamic State in Syria, has lost the latest round of her legal battle with the Home Office over its decision to remove her British citizenship.
- [09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2007 (5) SCC 228 : N Devindrappa vs state of karnataka : An act can result in both civil and criminal liability , merely in this case , act of the litigant has civil liability that does not mean that it cannot have criminal liability also[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2001 (1) CPR 51 : mehsana agro auto machines pvt ltd vs baldevbhai M patel : late delivery of vehicle by the dealer on account of late delivery by the manufacturer , interest on amount deposited till date of delivery @ 15% allowed[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2011 CRI LJ 3506 : Rajesh gutta vs state of AP : In a matrimonial proceeding initiated by wife as to cruelty wherein place of occurence is outside India , magistrate taking cognizance in india without obtaining sanction of central government is bad in law[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2002 (1) CPR 207 : gwalior ice factory vs MP electricity board : Excessive electricity bill settled by electricity board , remedy to claim interest on excessive deposit could not be availed from consumer forum[09/10, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 468 : varun pahwa vs Renu chaudhary : Power to grant amendment of pleadings is intended to serve ends of justice and not governed by narrow technical limitations ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )