[10/08, 10:56] Vinothpandian: 2021 (3) CTC 249 : state of Rajasthan vs Ashok kumar kashyap : conduct of mini trial in application for discharge condemned ( section 227 CRPC 1973 )
[10/08, 10:56] Vinothpandian: 2013 (4) CCC 315 SC ; kailash vs Nanhku & others : Purpose of providing time schedule for filing written statement under order 8 rule 1 of CPC is to expedite and not to scuttle hearing , provision being in domain of procedural law has to be held directory and not mandatory
[10/08, 10:56] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 11 : state of tamil.nadu rep by its secretary to government vs P subbuthai : Regarding transfer of an employee , only decision making process can be reviewed under article 226 not reasons for transfer
[10/08, 10:56] Vinothpandian: 2020 (3) CTC 1 (DB) : K Nirai mathi Azhagan vs union of india : income tax act 1961 section 234- F : permitting filing of returns after due date a privilege , intent of legislature to levy fee to motivate assessee to be prompt in filing returns or to pay additional fee , section 234 – f held a regulatory mechanism and not an arbitrary provision
[10/08, 10:56] Vinothpandian: 2010 (8) SLT 669 : Ashish Ranjan vs Anupama tandon : With regard to custody of child , mutual settlement between parties cannot come in way of well established principles in respect of custody of child cases
[10/08, 10:56] Vinothpandian: 2014 (5) CTC 199 : kuppuraj k vs M Rajasulochana : Party seeking divorce on grounds of desertion has to prove that desertion was for continuous period of 2 years preceding presentation of petition ( section 13 (1) (1-b) hindu marriage act 1955 )