Follow:
- Next story [7/12, 07:47] Sekarreporter: Madras HC bats for more cellphone towers – http://toi.in/tovMha90/a31ga8 Use the TOI app to get Breaking news and headlines. Download now: https://timesofindia.onelink.me/efRt/ASmwebshare [7/12, 07:47] Sekarreporter: 💐
- Previous story Full order THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.A.No.767 of 2015 Anbu Selvan …Appellant ..Vs.—–Taking into consideration the act of the accused on the body of P.W.2 victim girl, this Court finds that the appellant auto man/accused appears to be a “heartless person” having captalized the situation on the helplessness of P.W.1 visually challenged person” and successfully committed the act of sexual assault on her body and hence, this Court finds that considering the position of P.W.1 and the act of the accused, this Court finds that the accused is not entitled for reduction of the sentence, not even for a single day and the sexual assault on the woman are on the raise, while the victim girl is a visually challenged person and hence, the sentence awarded by the learned Sessions Judge for the proved charges are appears to be just and reasonable and the same cannot be termed as excessive. 45. In this view of the matter, the sentence passed by the Sessions Court is hereby confirmed..
Recent Posts
- Justice B Pugalendhi, who passed the order, also sought an explanation from the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Nagercoil for allowing the cross-examination of the witnesses more than three years after their chief
- CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY MCQ question 1. இந்திய அரசமைப்பின் சரத்து 13 எதை பற்றியது?
- ஐஏஎஸ் அதிகாரிக்கு பிறப்பித்த பிடிவாரண்ட் உத்தரவை எதிர்ததுஅரசு தாக்கல் செய்த அப்பீல் வழக்கை ஐகோர்ட் தள்ளுபடி செய்தது.
- Proper Service of Notice*: The court stressed that uploading notices on the GST portal alone may not be enough to constitute proper service, highlighting the need to explore other prescribed modes of service under Section 169 of the CGST Act.
- Justice Krishnan Ramasamy was hearing writ petitions filed by M/s Aarupadai and Co., a registered taxpayer under the GST Act, challenging the issuance of Show
More
Recent Posts
- Justice B Pugalendhi, who passed the order, also sought an explanation from the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Nagercoil for allowing the cross-examination of the witnesses more than three years after their chief
- CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY MCQ question 1. இந்திய அரசமைப்பின் சரத்து 13 எதை பற்றியது?
- ஐஏஎஸ் அதிகாரிக்கு பிறப்பித்த பிடிவாரண்ட் உத்தரவை எதிர்ததுஅரசு தாக்கல் செய்த அப்பீல் வழக்கை ஐகோர்ட் தள்ளுபடி செய்தது.
- Proper Service of Notice*: The court stressed that uploading notices on the GST portal alone may not be enough to constitute proper service, highlighting the need to explore other prescribed modes of service under Section 169 of the CGST Act.
- Justice Krishnan Ramasamy was hearing writ petitions filed by M/s Aarupadai and Co., a registered taxpayer under the GST Act, challenging the issuance of Show
