[02/07, 10:31] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 868 : N.N Global merchantile pvt ltd vs Indo unique flame ltd : Held civil aspect of fraud amenable to arbitration unless agreement itself has been rendered void
[02/07, 10:31] Vinothpandian: 2012 (6) supreme today 612 : chandrasekaran vs Administrative officer : wrongdoers must be denied profit from their frivolous litigation and that they should be prevented from introducing and relying upon , false pleadings and forged or fabricated documents in the records furnished by them to the court
[02/07, 10:31] Vinothpandian: 2016(5) CTC 117 : sarasu vs Ravi : sec 5 limitation act : Application for condoning delay filed under sec 5 to be dealt with liberally and leniently in order to do substantial justice to parties ,length of delay not a material factor for deciding application under section 5 of limitation act
[02/07, 10:31] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) DRTC 128 : state bank of india vs Veetee fine foods ltd : When bank or parties seek stamp of approval of compromise or settlement , then tribunal would be competent to examine said settlement or compromise in terms of sec 19 ( 20- A ) of RDDBFI act
[02/07, 10:31] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 504 : Rajkumaran VR vs BS lavanya ( DB ) : mere long separation is not a ground to snap matrimonial tie , held husband not entitled for divorce on that ground ( hindu marriage act 1955 section 13(1)(1-a))
[02/07, 10:31] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 180 : jesu ( died ) vs V virgin : Held requirement to file amended copy of plaint is for courts convenience , plaintiff cannot be non – suited for not filing amended copy ( order 6 rule 1 CPC 1908 )
[02/07, 10:31] Vinothpandian: 2020 (4) CTC 497 : Ravindranath GE medical associates pvt ltd chennai vs P Raja rao : while granting interim injunction or continuing existing injunction , court must see if there is bonafide contest between parties , court must also find which side balance of convenience lies ( order 39 CPC 1908 )