You may also like...
-
https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1733320608098963498?t=G35nm9N6KSi0pFGYQrYXFw&s=08 Thus, it can be seen that the appellant is only the owner of the superstructure. The second respondent temple is the owner of the land in question. It is entitled to revise the rent. Therefore, no exception can be taken to the findings of the learned Single Judge entitling the respondents to revise the rent. 22. In the result, finding no merits, the W.A.Nos. 1294 and 1302 of 2021 shall stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, C.M.P.Nos.8203 and 8236 of 2021 are closed. (S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 06.12.2023 Index : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : yes/no grs To 1. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034. 2. The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Ekambareswarar Thirukoil, Aminjikarai, Chennai – 600 029. 3. The Collector of Chennai District, Collector’s Office, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001. 4. The Tahsildar, Egmore-Nungambakkam Taluk, Chetput, Chennai – 600 031. THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. grs W.A.Nos.1294 and 1302 of 2021 06.12.2023. For Appellant : Mr.Om Prakash, Senior Counsel (in both W.As) for Mr.V.Venkatesan For Respondents : Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, (in both W.As) Special Government Pleader (HR & CE), for R1 : Mr.A.K.Sriram, Senior Counsel for Mr.S.D.Ramalingam, for R2 : Mr.P.Muthukumar, State Government Pleader for RR-3 and 4 COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment made by the Hon’ble Mr.Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy)
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 9, 2023
-
indian oil retsil out let case. Cj bench order for iocl adv ananth natarajan
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 16, 2024
-