Follow:
- Next story [2/21, 12:23] sekarreporter1: Erode election case dismissed [2/21, 12:23] sekarreporter1: Acj bench
- Previous story In view of the facts and circumstances, the appellant is entitled tosucceed. Accordingly, the judgement and decree dated 25.10.2016 passed in O.S.No.21 of 2011 is set aside and consequently, the Appeal Suit in A.S.No.257 of 2017 stands allowed. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 13.02.2023 Jeni Index : Yes Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes To The Judge, II Additional District Court, Salem. S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. Jeni A.S.No.257 of 2017 13.02.2023ê
Recent Posts
- Justice B Pugalendhi, who passed the order, also sought an explanation from the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Nagercoil for allowing the cross-examination of the witnesses more than three years after their chief
- CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY MCQ question 1. இந்திய அரசமைப்பின் சரத்து 13 எதை பற்றியது?
- ஐஏஎஸ் அதிகாரிக்கு பிறப்பித்த பிடிவாரண்ட் உத்தரவை எதிர்ததுஅரசு தாக்கல் செய்த அப்பீல் வழக்கை ஐகோர்ட் தள்ளுபடி செய்தது.
- Proper Service of Notice*: The court stressed that uploading notices on the GST portal alone may not be enough to constitute proper service, highlighting the need to explore other prescribed modes of service under Section 169 of the CGST Act.
- Justice Krishnan Ramasamy was hearing writ petitions filed by M/s Aarupadai and Co., a registered taxpayer under the GST Act, challenging the issuance of Show
More
Recent Posts
- Justice B Pugalendhi, who passed the order, also sought an explanation from the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Nagercoil for allowing the cross-examination of the witnesses more than three years after their chief
- CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY MCQ question 1. இந்திய அரசமைப்பின் சரத்து 13 எதை பற்றியது?
- ஐஏஎஸ் அதிகாரிக்கு பிறப்பித்த பிடிவாரண்ட் உத்தரவை எதிர்ததுஅரசு தாக்கல் செய்த அப்பீல் வழக்கை ஐகோர்ட் தள்ளுபடி செய்தது.
- Proper Service of Notice*: The court stressed that uploading notices on the GST portal alone may not be enough to constitute proper service, highlighting the need to explore other prescribed modes of service under Section 169 of the CGST Act.
- Justice Krishnan Ramasamy was hearing writ petitions filed by M/s Aarupadai and Co., a registered taxpayer under the GST Act, challenging the issuance of Show
