![[2/18, 16:12] Sekarreporter: [2/18, 16:09] Sekarreporter: [2/18, 15:52] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1229712676164554752?s=08 [2/18, 15:52] Sekarreporter: Full bench Cj msnj Tssj reference allowed regarding land acquisition issue for govt AAG narmada mam contention accepted https://t.co/MZeOxHBUhR [2/18, 15:52] Sekarreporter: 👍👍 [2/18, 16:10] Senthil News 7: Narmatha mam congrats 💐🎉🎊 [2/18, 16:10] Sathyam Tv Nithyanandan. s: வாழ்த்துகள் மேடம் 💐💐💐😍 [2/18, 16:12] NewsJ Reporter Jegadish Natarajan: Congrats mam💐](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2016(5) CTC 746 : Ayyasamy A vs A paramasivam : ” fraud is knowing misrepresentation of truth or concealment of material fact to induce another to act to his detriment [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2014(4) CTC 315 : Rajagopalan vs Gnanapandithan : Held non _ issuance of reply or counter affidavit by itself is not ground for allowing applications [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2016(4) CTC 92 : Axis bank vs SBS organics Pvt Ltd : SARFASi act 2002 sec 18 : Held pre – deposit made by borrower with tribunal would not empower bank to claim general lien ,banker cannot exercise right of general lien against pre – deposit amount deposited by borrower [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2013(1)CTC 931 SC : deputy inspector general of police vs S.Samuthiram : service law : mere acquittal of employee by criminal court has no impact on disciplinary proceedings initiated by employer ,punishment of dismissal of service cannot be interfered [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: AIR 2017 SC 1432 : Sasi vs Aravindakshan Nair : An application for review has to be disposed of as expeditiously as possible [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: AIR 1982 MP 8 : jairam vs jagatram : ignorance of law if pleaded is no ground for condonation of delay
- Previous story தீர்மானம் செல்லும் Inbadura Former i Mla: *அதிமுக பொதுக்குழு செல்லும்! ஓபிஎஸ் அப்பீல் மனுவை தள்ளுபடி செய்து உச்சநீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பு!*
Recent Posts
- Justice B Pugalendhi, who passed the order, also sought an explanation from the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Nagercoil for allowing the cross-examination of the witnesses more than three years after their chief
- CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY MCQ question 1. இந்திய அரசமைப்பின் சரத்து 13 எதை பற்றியது?
- ஐஏஎஸ் அதிகாரிக்கு பிறப்பித்த பிடிவாரண்ட் உத்தரவை எதிர்ததுஅரசு தாக்கல் செய்த அப்பீல் வழக்கை ஐகோர்ட் தள்ளுபடி செய்தது.
- Proper Service of Notice*: The court stressed that uploading notices on the GST portal alone may not be enough to constitute proper service, highlighting the need to explore other prescribed modes of service under Section 169 of the CGST Act.
- Justice Krishnan Ramasamy was hearing writ petitions filed by M/s Aarupadai and Co., a registered taxpayer under the GST Act, challenging the issuance of Show
More
Recent Posts
- Justice B Pugalendhi, who passed the order, also sought an explanation from the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Nagercoil for allowing the cross-examination of the witnesses more than three years after their chief
- CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY MCQ question 1. இந்திய அரசமைப்பின் சரத்து 13 எதை பற்றியது?
- ஐஏஎஸ் அதிகாரிக்கு பிறப்பித்த பிடிவாரண்ட் உத்தரவை எதிர்ததுஅரசு தாக்கல் செய்த அப்பீல் வழக்கை ஐகோர்ட் தள்ளுபடி செய்தது.
- Proper Service of Notice*: The court stressed that uploading notices on the GST portal alone may not be enough to constitute proper service, highlighting the need to explore other prescribed modes of service under Section 169 of the CGST Act.
- Justice Krishnan Ramasamy was hearing writ petitions filed by M/s Aarupadai and Co., a registered taxpayer under the GST Act, challenging the issuance of Show
