Author: Sekar Reporter

Income Tax Assessee Who Failed To Avail Option To Request Personal Hearing Can’t Claim That Personal Hearing Was Not Provided: Madras HC

Income Tax Assessee Who Failed To Avail Option To Request Personal Hearing Can’t Claim That Personal Hearing Was Not Provided: Madras HC

[10/10, 18:54] sekarreporter1: Income Tax Assessee Who Failed To Avail Option To Request Personal Hearing Can’t Claim That Personal Hearing Was Not Provided: Madras HC https://www.livelaw.in/tax-cases/assessee-failed-to-avail-departments-option-to-request-personal-hearing-cant-claim-personal-hearing-not-provided-madras-hc-272142[10/10, 18:54] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court ruled that...

Tangedco case நீதிபதிகள் பி.பி. பாலாஜி, ஜி.அருள் முருகன் அமர்வில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தபோது,மனுதாரர் தரப்பில் வழக்கறிஞர் எம் வேல்முருகன் ஆஜராகி வாதிட்டார்.

Tangedco case நீதிபதிகள் பி.பி. பாலாஜி, ஜி.அருள் முருகன் அமர்வில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தபோது,மனுதாரர் தரப்பில் வழக்கறிஞர் எம் வேல்முருகன் ஆஜராகி வாதிட்டார்.

மின்வாரியத்தில் தொழில்நுட்ப பணிகளுக்கு கேங்மேன்களை பயன்படுத்தக் கூடாது என தொடரப்பட்ட வழக்கில், தமிழ்நாடு மின் உற்பத்தி மற்றும் பகிர்மான கழகம் பதிலளிக்குமாறு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது .. தமிழ்நாடு மின்வாரியத்தில் கடந்த நான்கு ஆண்டுகளில் தொழில்நுட்ப பணிகளுக்கு திறன் சாராத கேங்மேன்களை பயன்படுத்தியதில் 70 பேர் மரணமடைந்துள்ளதைச்...

Gst case full order / show cause notice order to reply /THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMARandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW. P.No.28060 of 2019andW.M.P.No.27677 of 2019Harris Jayaraj,

Gst case full order / show cause notice order to reply /THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMARandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW. P.No.28060 of 2019andW.M.P.No.27677 of 2019Harris Jayaraj,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.08.2024CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMARandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW. P.No.28060 of 2019andW.M.P.No.27677 of 2019Harris Jayaraj,No.63, Kamrajar Street,Indira Nagar, Valasaravakkam, Chennai – 600 087. … PetitionerVs. [R.S.K.,...

Vallalar case full order W.P.Nos.9141, 8190, 13325 and 29630 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.32281 and 32282 of 2024R.SURESH KUMAR, J and S.SOUNTHAR, J(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESHKUMAR, J)Except W.P.No.29630 of 2024, all other three writ petitions have already been heard and successive interim orders have been passed by this Court. Last such order was passed by us on 19.09.2024, where interalia we have passed the following order :

Vallalar case full order W.P.Nos.9141, 8190, 13325 and 29630 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.32281 and 32282 of 2024R.SURESH KUMAR, J and S.SOUNTHAR, J(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESHKUMAR, J)Except W.P.No.29630 of 2024, all other three writ petitions have already been heard and successive interim orders have been passed by this Court. Last such order was passed by us on 19.09.2024, where interalia we have passed the following order :

W.P.Nos.9141, 8190, 13325 and 29630 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.32281 and 32282 of 2024R.SURESH KUMAR, J and S.SOUNTHAR, J(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESHKUMAR, J)Except W.P.No.29630 of 2024, all other three writ petitions...

[10/10, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2019 (1) MWN ( cri ) 36 : state rep by inspector of police , railway police station coimbatore vs naveen : In an appeal against acquittal , if view taken by trial court acquitting accused is reasonable and possible view , high court in appeal cannot substitute it by other view just because it appears to be a possible view[10/10, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) CCC 288 : Datti kameswari vs marrapu lakshmunaidu & others : evidence act 1872 section 65 : True copies of public documents certified by designated information officer can be taken as certified copies of public documents[10/10, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 539 : shanthimalai trust thiruvanamalai vs Arunachala education and environment development trust : civil court shall not proceed to pass exparte judgement within 30 days from the date of service of summons in suit , if so judgement passed would be in breach of mandatory requirement of order 5 rule 1 CPC 1908[10/10, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2017 (3) CCC 520 SC : shalu ojha vs prashant ojha : where an order is under challenge before High court , supreme court normally does not entertain petition against the same order[10/10, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2020 (6) CTC 245 : venkatesan M vs SBI cards and payments : Held though an order of rejection of plaint under order 7 rule 11 is a decree and an appeal would lie in cases where rejection is done without notice to aggrieved party , revision under article 227 is maintainable

[10/10, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2019 (1) MWN ( cri ) 36 : state rep by inspector of police , railway police station coimbatore vs naveen : In an appeal against acquittal , if view taken by trial court acquitting accused is reasonable and possible view , high court in appeal cannot substitute it by other view just because it appears to be a possible view[10/10, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) CCC 288 : Datti kameswari vs marrapu lakshmunaidu & others : evidence act 1872 section 65 : True copies of public documents certified by designated information officer can be taken as certified copies of public documents[10/10, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 539 : shanthimalai trust thiruvanamalai vs Arunachala education and environment development trust : civil court shall not proceed to pass exparte judgement within 30 days from the date of service of summons in suit , if so judgement passed would be in breach of mandatory requirement of order 5 rule 1 CPC 1908[10/10, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2017 (3) CCC 520 SC : shalu ojha vs prashant ojha : where an order is under challenge before High court , supreme court normally does not entertain petition against the same order[10/10, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2020 (6) CTC 245 : venkatesan M vs SBI cards and payments : Held though an order of rejection of plaint under order 7 rule 11 is a decree and an appeal would lie in cases where rejection is done without notice to aggrieved party , revision under article 227 is maintainable

[10/10, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2019 (1) MWN ( cri ) 36 : state rep by inspector of police , railway police station coimbatore vs naveen : In an appeal against acquittal , if view taken...

[10/10, 10:56] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1844241501813088398?t=jw5y82Vl04bkVg4Ovy3A6Q&s=08[10/10, 11:04] sekarreporter1: Tomorrow the book written by Mr.Selvam IAS, will be released by our Honorable supreme court Justice .R.Mahadevan J and 1st copy will be received by our Honorable Chief secretary Mr.Muruganadam ,at 6.30 pm ,All are welcome 🙏🙏

[10/10, 10:56] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1844241501813088398?t=jw5y82Vl04bkVg4Ovy3A6Q&s=08[10/10, 11:04] sekarreporter1: Tomorrow the book written by Mr.Selvam IAS, will be released by our Honorable supreme court Justice .R.Mahadevan J and 1st copy will be received by our Honorable Chief secretary Mr.Muruganadam ,at 6.30 pm ,All are welcome 🙏🙏

[10/10, 10:56] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1844241501813088398?t=jw5y82Vl04bkVg4Ovy3A6Q&s=08[10/10, 11:04] sekarreporter1: Tomorrow the book written by Mr.Selvam IAS, will be released by our Honorable supreme court Justice .R.Mahadevan J and 1st copy will be received by our Honorable Chief...

[10/10, 08:53] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1844217133724729360?t=pgjk4eA-8rfL-PJWwRvLvw&s=08[10/10, 08:53] sekarreporter1: CHANDRU LAW ACADEMYInviting you to OFFLINE / ONLINE coaching for Civil judge APP EXAMINATION

[10/10, 08:53] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1844217133724729360?t=pgjk4eA-8rfL-PJWwRvLvw&s=08[10/10, 08:53] sekarreporter1: CHANDRU LAW ACADEMYInviting you to OFFLINE / ONLINE coaching for Civil judge APP EXAMINATION

SUBJECT: The Central criminal Minor Acts Timings : 6 pm to 7. 30 pm Date: 10/10/2024 CONTACT NO : 7339650446 [10/10, 08:53] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1844217133724729360?t=pgjk4eA-8rfL-PJWwRvLvw&s=08[10/10, 08:53] sekarreporter1: CHANDRU LAW ACADEMYInviting you to OFFLINE / ONLINE...