Category: Uncategorized

In the event of not settling any part or the entire arrears of revised rent due to the Government of Tamil Nadu, the respondents are directed to initiate appropriate recovery proceedings against the writ petitioner / Madras Race Club and recover the entire dues by following the procedures as contemplated and by proceeding against all the persons, who all are responsible, liable and accountable for settling all Government dues in the manner known  to law.  	 	  	83. With the above directions, all the three Writ Petitions are disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 	 							29.03.2023 Index  : Yes Speaking order:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes Jeni/kak  Note: (1) For monitoring the implementation of this order, the Registry, High Court of Madras is directed to communicate the copy of this order to the Chief Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 	(2) Registry is directed to list the matter before this Court “For Reporting Compliance” on 16.06.2023.  To   1.The Secretary,    Government of Tamil Nadu,    Revenue Department,    Fort St.George,     Chennai – 600 009.  2.The District Collector of Chennai,    Singaravelar Maligai,    Rajaji Salai,     Chennai – 600 001.  3.The Tashildar, Guindy Taluk,    No.370, Richardson Park,    Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.   4.The Tahsildar, Velachery Taluk,    No.113, V.V.Koil Street,    Tharamani, Chennai – 600 015.  5.The Special Commissioner and    Commissioner of Land Administration    Ezhilagam, Chepauk,   Chennai – 600 005.  Copy to  The Chief Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.  S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.  Jeni/kak                W.P.Nos.29644 to 29646 of 2017

In the event of not settling any part or the entire arrears of revised rent due to the Government of Tamil Nadu, the respondents are directed to initiate appropriate recovery proceedings against the writ petitioner / Madras Race Club and recover the entire dues by following the procedures as contemplated and by proceeding against all the persons, who all are responsible, liable and accountable for settling all Government dues in the manner known to law. 83. With the above directions, all the three Writ Petitions are disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 29.03.2023 Index : Yes Speaking order:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes Jeni/kak Note: (1) For monitoring the implementation of this order, the Registry, High Court of Madras is directed to communicate the copy of this order to the Chief Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. (2) Registry is directed to list the matter before this Court “For Reporting Compliance” on 16.06.2023. To 1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Revenue Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The District Collector of Chennai, Singaravelar Maligai, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001. 3.The Tashildar, Guindy Taluk, No.370, Richardson Park, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015. 4.The Tahsildar, Velachery Taluk, No.113, V.V.Koil Street, Tharamani, Chennai – 600 015. 5.The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Administration Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. Copy to The Chief Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. Jeni/kak W.P.Nos.29644 to 29646 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 20.03.2023 PRONOUNCED ON : 29.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.29644 to 29646 of 2017 and W.M.P.Nos.31934 to 31942 of 2017 Madras Race...

Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy took note that the convict, Gnanasigamani of Vellakovil in Tiruppur had already undergone 700 days of imprisonment. Hence, he directed the octogenarian, who was 78 when he committed the crime, to surrender within a month, to

Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy took note that the convict, Gnanasigamani of Vellakovil in Tiruppur had already undergone 700 days of imprisonment. Hence, he directed the octogenarian, who was 78 when he committed the crime, to surrender within a month, to

The Madras High Court has commuted, from 10 years of rigorous imprisonment, to seven years, the punishment imposed on an 88-year-old shopkeeper for having a raped a 15-year-old girl who subsequently died by suicide,...

Ps Raman Senior Advt: Glad to inform you all that the stretch of Avvai Shanmugham Salai (Lloyds road) from Beach to Indian Bank has been renamed V.P.Raman Salai. Only the third time since 60 years (subject to correction) that a Main Road is being named after a Lawyer (exclude Judges). After V.L.Ethiraj and Mohan Kumaramangalam. 🙂🙏🏻

Ps Raman Senior Advt: Glad to inform you all that the stretch of Avvai Shanmugham Salai (Lloyds road) from Beach to Indian Bank has been renamed V.P.Raman Salai. Only the third time since 60 years (subject to correction) that a Main Road is being named after a Lawyer (exclude Judges). After V.L.Ethiraj and Mohan Kumaramangalam. 🙂🙏🏻

[3/29, 09:27] Ps Raman Senior Advt: Glad to inform you all that the stretch of Avvai Shanmugham Salai (Lloyds road) from Beach to Indian Bank has been renamed V.P.Raman Salai. Only the third time...

A Division bench of Justices R Suresh Kumar and KK Ramakrishnan appointed two senior advocates — B Kumar and C Arul Vadivel — to make submissions on the matter. The court also appointed advocate K Prabakar as Amicus Curiae in the case to assist the court

A Division bench of Justices R Suresh Kumar and KK Ramakrishnan appointed two senior advocates — B Kumar and C Arul Vadivel — to make submissions on the matter. The court also appointed advocate K Prabakar as Amicus Curiae in the case to assist the court

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court observed there is a need to review and revisit the proceedings conducted by the advisory board that deals with detention. A Division bench of Justices R Suresh...

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR  A.S.No.1077 of 2003 and C.M.P.(MD)No.1564 of 2023. The plaintiffs / respondents are liable to pay the Court fee payable on the suit. C.M.P.(MD)No.1564 of 2023 is allowed and the document viz., power of attorney dated 23.05.1994, executed by the Pakkiri Mohammed is marked as Ex.B7. No costs.

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.1077 of 2003 and C.M.P.(MD)No.1564 of 2023. The plaintiffs / respondents are liable to pay the Court fee payable on the suit. C.M.P.(MD)No.1564 of 2023 is allowed and the document viz., power of attorney dated 23.05.1994, executed by the Pakkiri Mohammed is marked as Ex.B7. No costs.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 13.03.2023 DELIVERED ON : 23.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.1077 of 2003 and C.M.P.(MD)No.1564 of 2023 1.Fathimuthu (Died) 2.Faritha Beevi 3.Ismail...

3/28, 22:37] App Chandresekar New: **********NEW BATCH********* *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY*  Inviting you to *OFFLINE / ONLINE coaching* for    *JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF/COACHING FOR JUNIOR ADVOCATES/AIBE*

3/28, 22:37] App Chandresekar New: **********NEW BATCH********* *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* Inviting you to *OFFLINE / ONLINE coaching* for *JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF/COACHING FOR JUNIOR ADVOCATES/AIBE*

[3/28, 22:37] App Chandresekar New: **********NEW BATCH********* *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* Inviting you to *OFFLINE / ONLINE coaching* for *JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF/COACHING FOR JUNIOR ADVOCATES/AIBE* *SUBJECT: THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT ,1882* *Date : 29...

Workmen Compensation Act  In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. The 2nd respondent – Insurance Company is directed to deposit a sum of 7,52,600/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Fifty Two Thousand and Six Hundred) along with interest at the rate of 12% p.a., from the date of petition till the date of deposit and costs within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if not already deposited. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.  09.03.2023  NCC : Yes/No  Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No vsm                           To   1.The Commissioner for Employee’s Compensation,  Dindigul.   2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.   N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.  vsm         C.M.A.(MD)No.946 of 2022 and C.M.P.(MD)No.9361 of 2022      09.03.2023

Workmen Compensation Act In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. The 2nd respondent – Insurance Company is directed to deposit a sum of 7,52,600/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Fifty Two Thousand and Six Hundred) along with interest at the rate of 12% p.a., from the date of petition till the date of deposit and costs within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if not already deposited. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 09.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No vsm To 1.The Commissioner for Employee’s Compensation, Dindigul. 2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. vsm C.M.A.(MD)No.946 of 2022 and C.M.P.(MD)No.9361 of 2022 09.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR C.M.A.(MD)No.946 of 2022 and C.M.P.(MD)No.9361 of 2022 The Manager, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Divisional Office, 107,...