Chennai Ayyanavaram Rape case 15 convicted by Sekar Reporter · February 2, 2020 The All-Women Police arrested 17 persons — all of them service staff at the residential apartment where the girl lived with her family. The accused had developed an acquaintance with the victim and reportedly committed aggravated sexual assault and aggravated penetrative assault on several occasions, from January 15 to July 14, 2018.The prosecution alleged that the child was unable to understand what happened to her, and that she was raped by 17 persons, on several occasions, in a period of six months. The crime came to the notice of the girl’s parents when they took her to a hospital after she complained of stomach ache.All accused were employed in the apartment complex as lift operators, electricians, plumbers, security guards and gardeners. The apartment association had engaged them through three agencies. Lift operator Ravikumar, 56, is said to have initiated the sexual assault. Other offenders followed him, the prosecution claimed.The trial was conducted by special public prosecutor N. Ramesh, before special judge R.N. Manjula. One of the accused, N. Babu, died of ill health during trial, and 16 others went on to face trial. On Saturday, amid tight security, the 16 offenders were brought to the court complex, located on the Madras High Court premises. The court conducted in-camera proceedings.“On the production of the offenders, the special judge, Ms. Manjula, held 15 of them guilty for offences they were charged with, and convicted them, while A.P. Gunasekaran was acquitted. Later, she questioned them about the quantum of sentence to be imposed against them. After recording their individual replies, the judge adjourned the matter to Monday to pronounce the quantum of sentences on them.”R. Ravikumar, 56; M. Suresh, 32; A. Rajasekar, 40; A. Erald Bross, 58; B.J. Sugumaran, 65; N. Abishek, 23; K. Murugesu, 54; N. Paramasivam, 60; N. Palani, 40; A. Jayaganesh, 28; P. Gunasekaran, 55; N. Babu, 36; B. Deenadayalan, 50; A. Jayaraman, 26; E. Surya, 23; J. Raja, 30, and A. Umapathy, 42, were charged under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
Justice T.S.Sivagnanam and V.Bhawani Subbaroyan noted that the assessee’s vendor had claimed depreciation to the extent of Rs.3 Crores within six years and when the owner sells the windmill to the new purchaser, the new purchaser cannot get the same benefit for the enhanced value, as there is no additional wind energy capacity installed. Ultimately, the assessing officer disagreed with the assessee and disallowed the claim of depreciation to the tune of Rs.77,12,640. Thus, the court appreciated the factual position and came to the conclusion that the order passed by the assessing officer requires no interference. September 16, 2020 by Sekar Reporter · Published September 16, 2020
How Obama has Trumped our Bihar Poll Pundits? Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan So Bihar elections are now done and dusted. Nitish Kumar is set to assume November 16, 2020 by Sekar Reporter · Published November 16, 2020
Ag பரபரப்பு வாதம் with jinna state pp in Navj sumoto August 24, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published August 24, 2023