Follow:
- Next story [12/9, 07:26] Sekarreporter: Justice is not instantaneous, only what is legal is just: CJ https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/puducherry/justice-is-not-instantaneous-only-what-is-legal-is-just-cj/article30240400.ece?utm_campaign=article_share&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=whatsapp.com [12/9, 07:26] Sekarreporter: Justice is not instantaneous, only what is legal is just: CJ SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT PUDUCHERRY, DECEMBER 09, 2019 01:01 IST UPDATED: DECEMBER 09, 2019 01:03 IST Advocates are important part of the Constitution, says Sahi at Law Day celebrations Madras High Court Chief Justice A.P. Sahi on Sunday said there is now a talk about
- Previous story Court flays failure to verify if notices had been served on respondents Justice S.M. Subramaniam of the Madras High Court has passed a judicial order calling for an explanation from its Registry for not having taken steps to verify whether court notices had been served on the respondents, even in cases that were pending for over a decade, and to get the cases listed for completion of the process. It was during the hearing of an Appeal Suit pending since 2007, the judge found the court to have ordered notices in the case on April 11, 2007.
Recent Posts
- முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் #செந்தில்பாலாஜியின் ஜாமீன் மனுவை #மே 6ம் தேதிக்கு ஒத்திவைத்தது #உச்சநீதிமன்றம்!
- The Madras High Court Advocates Association would like to point out that the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, a Statutory Body under the Advocates Act, 1961, issues Vehicles Stickers to enrolled advocates after verification of their RC Books & Enrolment Certificates, with the Vehicle Registration Number and Hologram. This is meant for seamless entry and parking on Court campuses and not to seek immunity from traffic rules. A clear distinction needs to be made between the issue of such authorised stickers by a statutory body and advocate stickers sold on pavements which even non-advocates may end up misusing.
- [29/04, 11:38] sekarreporter1: #JUSTIN || கொடநாடு வழக்கு ஒத்திவைப்பு
- [29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt CJ’s Bench agrees to hear tomorrow a plea by a doctor, employed in Australia, for conduct of special polling in Coimbatore parliamentary constituency for the voters whose names were found to be missing from the electoral list @THChennai BG[29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: .
- today 5 legal tips Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial
More
Recent Posts
- முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் #செந்தில்பாலாஜியின் ஜாமீன் மனுவை #மே 6ம் தேதிக்கு ஒத்திவைத்தது #உச்சநீதிமன்றம்!
- The Madras High Court Advocates Association would like to point out that the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, a Statutory Body under the Advocates Act, 1961, issues Vehicles Stickers to enrolled advocates after verification of their RC Books & Enrolment Certificates, with the Vehicle Registration Number and Hologram. This is meant for seamless entry and parking on Court campuses and not to seek immunity from traffic rules. A clear distinction needs to be made between the issue of such authorised stickers by a statutory body and advocate stickers sold on pavements which even non-advocates may end up misusing.
- [29/04, 11:38] sekarreporter1: #JUSTIN || கொடநாடு வழக்கு ஒத்திவைப்பு
- [29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt CJ’s Bench agrees to hear tomorrow a plea by a doctor, employed in Australia, for conduct of special polling in Coimbatore parliamentary constituency for the voters whose names were found to be missing from the electoral list @THChennai BG[29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: .
- today 5 legal tips Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial