Dmk agitation case full order THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN & T HE HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA by Sekar Reporter · December 23, 2019 [12/23, 07:19] Sekarreporter 1: W.M.P.No.36634 of 2019 in W.P.Nos.35712 and W.P.35713 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 22.12.2019 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN & T HE HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA W.M.P.No.36634 of 2019 in W.P.Nos.35712 and W.P.35713 of 2019 W.M.P.No.36634 of 2019 in W.P.No.35712 of 2019 Varaaki S/o.Radhakrishnan Founder and President Indian Makkal Mandram No.2/3, Sudhananda Bharathi Street, Ganapathipuram, East Tambaram, Chennai-600 059. … Petitioner -vs- The Chief Secretary, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai-600 009. The Home Secretary, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai-600 009. 1/10 [12/23, 07:20] Sekarreporter 1: W.M.P.No.36634 of 2019 in W.P.Nos.35712 and W.P.35713 of 2019 The Director General of Police, O/o.The Director General of Police Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police Commissionarate Veppery, Chennai-600 007. … Respondents P rayer in WP: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents herein from giving any kind of permission to the unlawful demonstration to be conducted on 23.12.2019 by the Opposition Parties in the State of Tamil Nadu. Prayer in WMP: To grant an order of interim injunction restraining the opposition Parties in the State of Tamil Nadu from proceeding with the unlawful Demonstration to be conducted on 23.12.2019, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Janakiram For Respondents : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayan Govt. Pleader W.P.No.35713 of 2019 A.Ezhilarasu S/o.Arunachalam 97, APH Road, Ezil Rajkumar Illam, Avadi, Chennai-600 054. … Petitioner -vs- 2/10 [12/23, 07:20] Sekarreporter 1: W.M.P.No.36634 of 2019 in W.P.Nos.35712 and W.P.35713 of 2019 Mr.Thamimun Ansari M.L.A., General Secretary Manitha Neya Jananayaga Katchi 26, Kalitheru, Thoppudurai Post Vedharanyan Taluk, Nagapattinaum District The General Secretary Social Democratic Party of India, (SDPI) 4/7, Ibrahim Sahib Street, Seethakadi Nagar, Mannady, Chennnai-1. The Chief Secretary Govt of Tamilnadu Secretariat, Fort St George Chennai-600 009. The Director General of Police State Police Head Quarters Government of Tamil Nadu Secretariat, Fort St.George Chennai-600 009. The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai Vepery, Egmore Chennai-600 008. The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Municipal Corporation, Chennai … Respondents P rayer in WP: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 15 th and 16 th respondents not to permit the 1 st to 13 th respondents to conduct the scheduled rally / procession / 5/10 [12/23, 07:20] Sekarreporter 1: W.M.P.No.36634 of 2019 in W.P.Nos.35712 and W.P.35713 of 2019 protest on 23.12.2019 as against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 since the same kind of held procession in Delhi, Karnataka, U.P., Assalm turned violent and affected the Normal Tempo of life, in the larger interest of public, public properties and to protect the law and order on the basis of The Newspaper Report published in Dinamalar Tamil Daily dated 21.12.2019. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Krishnamurthy For R14 to R17 : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayan Govt. Pleader I N T E R I M O R D E R S.VAIDYANATHAN,J., AND P.T.ASHA,J., The Writ Petition in W.P.No.35713 of 2019 is admitted. Notice. The petitioners seek to forbear the respondents herein from giving any kind of permission to the unlawful demonstration to be conducted on 23.12.2019 by the Opposition Parties in the State of Tamil Nadu. When the matters are taken up for hearing, it is represented by the 6/10 [12/23, 07:21] Sekarreporter 1: W.M.P.No.36634 of 2019 in W.P.Nos.35712 and W.P.35713 of 2019 The rejection order dated 22.12.2019 has not been challenged by the respondents in W.P.No.35713 of 2019. However, the petitioners apprehend that there may be untoward incident, if the respondents, defying the rejection order, proceeds to conduct the demonstration/protest and they, therefore, seek to forbear the respondents from giving any kind of permission to the unlawful demonstration to be conducted on 23.12.2019 by the Opposition Parties in the State of Tamil Nadu. In a democratic country, a peaceful demonstration cannot be prevented, as it is the backbone of the democratic set up. From the reply given by the respondents, it could be seen that the political party, which is scheduled to conduct the rally / procession / protest, is reluctant to take on responsibility. However, according to us, the queries raised by the Police are indeed very relevant to the present case on hand in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Destruction of Public and Private Properties vs. State of A.P. and Others, reported in AIR 2009 SC 2266, in which the Hon’ble Supreme Court has stated as follows: 8/10 [12/23, 07:21] Sekarreporter 1: W.M.P.No.36634 of 2019 in W.P.Nos.35712 and W.P.35713 of 2019 Though the reply given by the Government Pleader is convincing, we do not want to play with the life of innocent people in case of any untoward incident and it is the duty of the Court to protect every citizen of the State in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme in the case of Destruction of Public and Private Properties vs. State of A.P. and Others (cited supra). Hence, as an interim measure, in the event of the political parties proceeding with the agitation “DESPITE REFUSAL” there shall be an interim direction to the Police that the entire area, including the diverted area as found mentioned in the pamphlet of the respondents (it was not originally indicated in the application made by them), for which the permission for procession is sought should be videographed and the drone technology can also be used for the purpose of recording the demonstration so that the liability can be foisted on the leaders and not on the followers. Notice. Post on 30.12.2019. Sd…/- 22.12.2019 2/2 10/10
emembering Senior Advocate C. Natarajan, the Man behind Taxation Reforms in India —| By : Senior Advocate N. Venkataraman Senior Advocate C NatarajanC Natarajan – Taxscan October 3, 2020 by Sekar Reporter · Published October 3, 2020
Savuku case dismissed judge c v karthikeyan Case dismissed on the ground that the petitioner had not explained how these books would be useful to the prisoners. Judge says even the counsel had fairly admitted that he too had not read the books to satisfy himself before presenting the case before the court February 20, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published February 20, 2023
Mr. P. Wilson,* Senior Advocate, Member of Parliament —–today zoom meeting 11 o clock———- July 26, 2020 by Sekar Reporter · Published July 26, 2020