Follow:
- Next story N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. Pursuant to the earlier orders passed by this Court on 29.03.2021, the matter has been placed before this Court as “specially ordered case”, after obtaining appropriate orders from the Hon’ble Chief Justice. 2.The petitioners as well as their respective parents were directed to attend counselling before Ms.Vidhya Dinakaran, Counselling Psychologist. On the request made by this Court, the Psychotherapist also readily accepted to counsel the parties.
- Previous story “I am not fully ‘woke’ on this aspect:” Madras High Court Judge fixes appointment with psychologist to understand same-sex relationships better “I honestly feel that such a session with a professional will help me understand same-sex relationships better and will pave way for my evolution,” the Judge said in his order. “I am not fully ‘woke’ on this aspect:” Madras High Court Judge fixes appointment with psychologist to understand same-sex relationships better Justice Anand Venkatesh, Madras High Court
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Civil Revision Petition No. 2093 of 2024 and CMP. No. 11171 of 2024 — The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Housing Board
- ஓய்வு பெறும் நேரத்தில் டிஸ்மிஸ் செய்யக்கூடாது
- Madras High Court: In a suit filed seeking relief in respect of alleged infringement of the personality rights of classical dancer Dr Anita R Ratnam, she has presented multiple interim applications seeking injunctive relief in addition to the application for combination of causes of action, the
- Supreme Court led by outgoing Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna released three sets of documents to shore up public confidence in its internal processes. These include: PDF documents detailing the procedure for the appointment of Supreme Court and High Court judges;
- Supreme Court held that while considering an appeal against the order of the Trial Court refusing to grant an injunction pending the disposal of the suit, the High Court can’t dismiss the substantive portion of the suit itself and direct that the remaining part of the suit be agitated in a suit filed by the defendant. The Apex Court was
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Civil Revision Petition No. 2093 of 2024 and CMP. No. 11171 of 2024 — The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Housing Board
- ஓய்வு பெறும் நேரத்தில் டிஸ்மிஸ் செய்யக்கூடாது
- Madras High Court: In a suit filed seeking relief in respect of alleged infringement of the personality rights of classical dancer Dr Anita R Ratnam, she has presented multiple interim applications seeking injunctive relief in addition to the application for combination of causes of action, the
- Supreme Court led by outgoing Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna released three sets of documents to shore up public confidence in its internal processes. These include: PDF documents detailing the procedure for the appointment of Supreme Court and High Court judges;
- Supreme Court held that while considering an appeal against the order of the Trial Court refusing to grant an injunction pending the disposal of the suit, the High Court can’t dismiss the substantive portion of the suit itself and direct that the remaining part of the suit be agitated in a suit filed by the defendant. The Apex Court was
