Follow:
- Next story justice P Rajamanickam directed the Chennai police commissioner to file his reply by February 10. In his petition, Murugadoss submitted that he was not liable for providing any money to anybody for the film in any manner whatsoever, as it was the sole obligation and liability of the producer Lyca Productions.
- Previous story High Court acquits two IPS officers in a 30-year-old alleged crime: The Madras High Court has finally given a quietus to two criminal appeals pending before it for the last 17 years in connection with an alleged crime that took place about 30 years ago. It set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by a trial court on two Indian Police Service (IPS) officers for having indulged in corrupt practices while procuring fire fighting centrifugal pumps for the Fire and Rescue Services Department between May 1989 and July 1992.
Recent Posts
- This Court does not find any infirmity in the present form of the suit except for non-joinder of necessary parties. If ExA.16-Will is proved as per law, the defendant has no right to interfere with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. This Court believes that the process of adjudication involves not only adjudication of laws, but also adjudication of justice. Hence, in view of the above narrative and in the interest of justice, this Court is of the view that the plaintiff shall be given liberty to file a fresh suit after impleading the daughters of Rajaram, making appropriate plea with necessary documents and adding the other properties left by Rajaram as well, if so desired and/or advised. 20.Resultantly, the Second Appeal is dismissed with liberty to file fresh suit as indicated above. No costs. 22.08.2024 ksa-2/tk Index : Yes Speaking Order : Yes Neutral Citation Case : Yes To 1.The Sub Court, Tambaram 2. The District Munsif Court, Tambaram 3.The Section Officer VR Section High Court of Madras R.SAKTHIVEL,J. Ksa-2/tk S.A.No.431 of 2019 22.08.2024
- https://youtu.be/b19XX6iBF-0?si=jChQT2RDXWHC90G0 The top court upheld its 2017 verdict which permitted light motor vehicle license holders to drive transport vehicles weighing up to 7500 kilograms. The Supreme Court’s five-judge Constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that a person holding a driving licence for a light motor vehicle (LMV) is entitled to drive a transport vehicle under a gross weight of 7,500 kg.
- bench comprising Chief Justice KR Shriram and Justice Mohammed Shaffiq gave the direction, and also pulled up the secretary for failing to obey the earlier direction issued on October 21, seeking a similar affidavit. If the secretary once again fails to file the affidavit, it would be viewed as wilful and deliberate disobedience, the judges said.
- Smsj bench add pp muniappa raj argued. The Madras High Court has constituted a committee with members from the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, and other advocates’ association to inspect the facilities in prison available to the detainees and their legal advisers.
- The Tamil Nadu government on Tuesday informed the Madras High Court that a standard operating procedure (SOP) is being worked out for proper implementation of court orders passed in criminal cases. Public Prosecutor Hasan Mohamed Jinnah made the submission before Justice AD Jagadish Chandira when a contempt of
More
Recent Posts
- This Court does not find any infirmity in the present form of the suit except for non-joinder of necessary parties. If ExA.16-Will is proved as per law, the defendant has no right to interfere with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. This Court believes that the process of adjudication involves not only adjudication of laws, but also adjudication of justice. Hence, in view of the above narrative and in the interest of justice, this Court is of the view that the plaintiff shall be given liberty to file a fresh suit after impleading the daughters of Rajaram, making appropriate plea with necessary documents and adding the other properties left by Rajaram as well, if so desired and/or advised. 20.Resultantly, the Second Appeal is dismissed with liberty to file fresh suit as indicated above. No costs. 22.08.2024 ksa-2/tk Index : Yes Speaking Order : Yes Neutral Citation Case : Yes To 1.The Sub Court, Tambaram 2. The District Munsif Court, Tambaram 3.The Section Officer VR Section High Court of Madras R.SAKTHIVEL,J. Ksa-2/tk S.A.No.431 of 2019 22.08.2024
- https://youtu.be/b19XX6iBF-0?si=jChQT2RDXWHC90G0 The top court upheld its 2017 verdict which permitted light motor vehicle license holders to drive transport vehicles weighing up to 7500 kilograms. The Supreme Court’s five-judge Constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that a person holding a driving licence for a light motor vehicle (LMV) is entitled to drive a transport vehicle under a gross weight of 7,500 kg.
- bench comprising Chief Justice KR Shriram and Justice Mohammed Shaffiq gave the direction, and also pulled up the secretary for failing to obey the earlier direction issued on October 21, seeking a similar affidavit. If the secretary once again fails to file the affidavit, it would be viewed as wilful and deliberate disobedience, the judges said.
- Smsj bench add pp muniappa raj argued. The Madras High Court has constituted a committee with members from the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, and other advocates’ association to inspect the facilities in prison available to the detainees and their legal advisers.
- The Tamil Nadu government on Tuesday informed the Madras High Court that a standard operating procedure (SOP) is being worked out for proper implementation of court orders passed in criminal cases. Public Prosecutor Hasan Mohamed Jinnah made the submission before Justice AD Jagadish Chandira when a contempt of