Follow:
- Next story [3/4, 17:53] Sekarreporter 1: [3/4, 17:47] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Very rarely an additional judge is transferred before becoming permanent!it is not the case of justice kannan who went to P&H hc.It looks as if he was originally to be appointed in Delhi HC.Since that might not have been possible he was appointed here only to be shifted by transfer mode!Madras Hc has become launching pad for many and it looks like a transit house!!It is a pity that the Bar never discusses such issues! [3/4, 17:51] Sekarreporter 1: [3/4, 18:01] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: In service law there are several methods of appointing a person to a post.They are direct recruitment (e.g.Bar),promotion(e.g.service judges).But their there is yet another source .i.e.”transfer from other service”.This method is slowly entering in to the service of higher judiciary &it is not found in the Constitution.Justice MM Ismail was appointed in Delhi High court,when that court was created for the first time[1964] .After an year he was appointed to our high court in( 1965).!! It was not an involuntary act.After 55 years there is a repeat performance in a reverse order!!!!
- Previous story (TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, PART 1 SECTION 2) No.K-13026/0 112020-US.I Government of India Ministry of Law and Justice (Department of Justice) Jaisalmer House, 26, Man Singh Road, NEW DELHI-I 10 011, dated 04th March, 2020. NOTIFICATION In exercise of the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 222 of the Constitution of India, the President, after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, is pleased to transfer Shri Justice Subramonium Prasad, Additional Judge of the Madras High Court, as an Additional Judge of the Delhi High Court and to direct him to assume charge of his office in the Delhi High Court. (Raji~h~:; Joint Secretary to the Government of India Tele: 2338 3037 To The Manager, Government of India Press, Minto Road, New Delhi.
Recent Posts
- Income Tax Assessee Who Failed To Avail Option To Request Personal Hearing Can’t Claim That Personal Hearing Was Not Provided: Madras HC
- Family court case THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANANC.R.P. No.1406 of 2024
- Tangedco case நீதிபதிகள் பி.பி. பாலாஜி, ஜி.அருள் முருகன் அமர்வில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தபோது,மனுதாரர் தரப்பில் வழக்கறிஞர் எம் வேல்முருகன் ஆஜராகி வாதிட்டார்.
- Gst case full order / show cause notice order to reply /THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMARandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW. P.No.28060 of 2019andW.M.P.No.27677 of 2019Harris Jayaraj,
- Vallalar case full order W.P.Nos.9141, 8190, 13325 and 29630 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.32281 and 32282 of 2024R.SURESH KUMAR, J and S.SOUNTHAR, J(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESHKUMAR, J)Except W.P.No.29630 of 2024, all other three writ petitions have already been heard and successive interim orders have been passed by this Court. Last such order was passed by us on 19.09.2024, where interalia we have passed the following order :
More
Recent Posts
- Income Tax Assessee Who Failed To Avail Option To Request Personal Hearing Can’t Claim That Personal Hearing Was Not Provided: Madras HC
- Family court case THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANANC.R.P. No.1406 of 2024
- Tangedco case நீதிபதிகள் பி.பி. பாலாஜி, ஜி.அருள் முருகன் அமர்வில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தபோது,மனுதாரர் தரப்பில் வழக்கறிஞர் எம் வேல்முருகன் ஆஜராகி வாதிட்டார்.
- Gst case full order / show cause notice order to reply /THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMARandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW. P.No.28060 of 2019andW.M.P.No.27677 of 2019Harris Jayaraj,
- Vallalar case full order W.P.Nos.9141, 8190, 13325 and 29630 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.32281 and 32282 of 2024R.SURESH KUMAR, J and S.SOUNTHAR, J(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESHKUMAR, J)Except W.P.No.29630 of 2024, all other three writ petitions have already been heard and successive interim orders have been passed by this Court. Last such order was passed by us on 19.09.2024, where interalia we have passed the following order :