You may also like...
-
-
45.For the aforesaid reasons, the request of the appellants are taken on record and the Writ Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.46.Even though we have found that the impleading petitioner has a locus standi to be represented in these Intra Court Appeals in view of the withdrawal of these Intra Court Appeals, it would be a futile exercise to order the impleading petitions, hence the Application for impleading are closed as unnecessary. However, there shall be no order as to costs.(R.S.K.,J.) (K.B., J.)28.03.2024Index: YesSpeaking Order Neutral Citation:YespbnR.SURESH KUMAR., J. and K.KUMARESH BABU.,J.pbnWrit Appeal Nos.847 & 850 of 2019& CMP. No.17216 & 17220 of 202328.03.2024
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 28, 2024
-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P.(MD).Nos.25387, 24847. levy of penalty ought to be preceded by giving a show cause notice enabling the petitioners to submit their objections. In the absence of any such notice, the proceedings would suffer from violation of natural justice. Therefore, the above impugned orders insofar as it imposes penalty are liable to be set-aside.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 22, 2023