I thank the organisers, the legal fraternity and all others for providing me plotform to share my thoughts. Justice S.Nagamuthu. New Delhi
[4/19, 13:00] Sekarreporter: [4/19, 11:03] Advt Purusothaman: We salute Lordship SNJ for this great lecture. Very elucidating on Evidence Act.
It is learnt that Lordship gave many lectures in Supreme Court Bar also.
It would be useful if all his lectures are posted in one place. May be his own blog or something like that.
Once again we thank him for his lecture. This lecture can also be reduced in written form and published in some journals like CTC.
[4/19, 12:59] Sekarreporter: 🌹
[4/19, 16:57] Sekarreporter: [4/19, 07:19] Chanduru Adv: It was an excellent session of learning… He explained it in such a manner that even a law student would have understood easily… Great work.. sincere thanks to the Judge and organisers. 🙏🏻
[4/19, 08:34] Sekarreporter: 🌹
![Justices M.M. Sundresh and Krishnan Ramasamy issued the direction while disposing of an appeal preferred by National Insurance Company challenging an award of ₹1.93 crore to the family members of an engineer who died in a road accident after a bus dashed hit his car on July 6, 2012. [2/19, 07:37] Sekarreporter: Incongruous evidence The judges pointed out that though the claimants themselves had stated that the income of the deceased was only ₹1 lakh a month, the presiding officer had ended up determining the income to be ₹1.25 lakh per month despite no acceptable evidence having been produced to substantiate the income during his lifetime.](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
