Follow:
- Next story Roc.No.1363/2020/RG MOSTURGENT CIRCULAR Sub: COVID 19 – Nation wide lockdown – Further instructions of the Hon’ble the Chief Justice – c o m m u n i c a t e d – Regarding. Ref: 1. High Court’s Circular in Roc.No.1363/2020/RG, dated 24.03.2020, 12.04.2020 & 18.04.2020 2. HighCourt’s Notification No.113/2020, dated 17.04.2020 , In view of the prevailing conditions of COVID-19 and in order to completely secure the premises of the High Court for preventing the spread of any infection or otherwise, all judicial proceedings in the High Court will be conducted only through video-conferencing. The court-halls will not be accessible for any judicial function during the lockdown period to keep the court-halls sanitized and hygienically fit for any future use. All judicial functioning by the respective Hon’ble Judges as per the roster assigned will function only through video-conferencing till further orders. HIGHCOURT,MADRAS Sd/- C.KUMARAPPAN DATED:19-04-2020 REGISTRARGENERAL
- Previous story CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY INVITING JUDICIAL ASPIRANTS – TODAY’S SESSION ON Subject :CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 1973 Timing : 06:00PM- 07:25PM Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 Organized by : Advocate Anjuman 9865069966 is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Topic: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 1973 – LECTURE BY ADVOCATE R. CHANDRASEKARAN. I D AND PASSWORD WILL BE SENT TO THE REGISTERED PARTICIPANTS AND TO i THE PARTICIPANTS WHO HAVE ALREADY REGISTERED FOR REGISTRATION CONTACT 9003116090/ 7339650446
Recent Posts
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIW. P.No. 25446 of 2021andW.M.P.No.26886 of 2021Dhanraj Baid Jain College,(Institution of Tamil Nadu Educational & Medical Trust),
- THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYW.P.No.27875 of 2024& W.M.P.No.30397 of 2024/Upon production of proof with regard to the payment as stated above, the concerned Appellate Authority shall consider and dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law, by providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, without pressing for limitation. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
- this year, Srinivasan filed a civil suit against the Madras Music Academy,
- vacation bench of Justice PB Balaji and Justice G Arul Murugan heard the PIL moved by T Vennila, from Chennai. The petitioner contended that in the past four years unskilled field workers have lost their lives in Tangedco solely because they were made to perform tasks that they were neither recruited for nor trained to do the tasks. Apart from these 70 fatalities, there have been recurrent life-altering accidents, wherein over a 100 victims have been physically disabled, she said.
- The Madras High Court presided over by Justice Lakshminarayanan ruled in favour of Sindhuja setting aside the earlier order of the Family Court. The High Court directed the family welfare court to determine appropriate compensation for Sindhuja, emphasising that under Section 18 of the Domestic Violence Act, the victim’s protection must come first.
More
Recent Posts
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIW. P.No. 25446 of 2021andW.M.P.No.26886 of 2021Dhanraj Baid Jain College,(Institution of Tamil Nadu Educational & Medical Trust),
- THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYW.P.No.27875 of 2024& W.M.P.No.30397 of 2024/Upon production of proof with regard to the payment as stated above, the concerned Appellate Authority shall consider and dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law, by providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, without pressing for limitation. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
- this year, Srinivasan filed a civil suit against the Madras Music Academy,
- vacation bench of Justice PB Balaji and Justice G Arul Murugan heard the PIL moved by T Vennila, from Chennai. The petitioner contended that in the past four years unskilled field workers have lost their lives in Tangedco solely because they were made to perform tasks that they were neither recruited for nor trained to do the tasks. Apart from these 70 fatalities, there have been recurrent life-altering accidents, wherein over a 100 victims have been physically disabled, she said.
- The Madras High Court presided over by Justice Lakshminarayanan ruled in favour of Sindhuja setting aside the earlier order of the Family Court. The High Court directed the family welfare court to determine appropriate compensation for Sindhuja, emphasising that under Section 18 of the Domestic Violence Act, the victim’s protection must come first.