Justice RMT Teekaa Raman and Justice PB Balaji noted that as per Section 3(2) Diplomatic and Consular (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 any document affixed, impressed, or subscribed with the seal and signature of the Consular shall be admitted in evidence without proof of seal or signature.”

[22/05, 08:38] sekarreporter1: “Justice RMT Teekaa Raman and Justice PB Balaji noted that as per Section 3(2) Diplomatic and Consular (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 any document affixed, impressed, or subscribed with the seal and signature of the Consular shall be admitted in evidence without proof of seal or signature.”
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-certificate-attested-by-consular-of-india-accepted-as-evidence-258522#:~:text=Justice%20RMT%20Teekaa%20Raman%20and%20Justice%20PB%20Balaji%20noted%20that%20as%20per%20Section%203(2)%20Diplomatic%20and%20Consular%20(Oaths%20and%20Fees)%20Act%2C%201948%20any%20document%20affixed%2C%20impressed%2C%20or%20subscribed%20with%20the%20seal%20and%20signature%20of%20the%20Consular%20shall%20be%20admitted%20in%20evidence%20without%20proof%20of%20seal%20or%20signature.
[22/05, 08:38] sekarreporter1: 👍