SEKAR REPORTER

Law tips Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) CCC 75 SC : Baranagore jute factory Plc mazdoor sangh vs Baranagore jute factory : directions explicit in the judgement or ” are plainly self evident can be taken into account for determining its disobedience or wilful violation ( section 12 contempt of courts act 1971 )

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

[30/05, 11:10] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) CCC 75 SC : Baranagore jute factory Plc mazdoor sangh vs Baranagore jute factory : directions explicit in the judgement or ” are plainly self evident can be taken into account for determining its disobedience or wilful violation ( section 12 contempt of courts act 1971 )
[30/05, 11:10] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) CTC 264 : lancor holdings ltd vs prem kumar menon : court cannot repair award and cannot supplement relief awarded with its own relief ( sec 34 Arbitration and coincilation act 1996 )
[30/05, 11:10] Vinothpandian: 2021 ( 3) CTC 920 SC : sanjiv prakash vs seema kukreja : Held court in an application under section 11 of the arbitration and coincilation act 1996 not to conduct a mini trial so as to usurp jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal
[30/05, 11:10] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 274 : mahalakshmi.vs district collector , virudhunagar district : Pertaining to pregnancy of minor girl , held though safety.and health of victim / minor is paramount , interest of unborn child to be considered , unborn child also a person , court must consider on facts if termination of pregnancy would be in best interest of unborn child
[30/05, 11:10] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 389 : Director ( HR ) oil & natural gas corp ltd new delhi vs B uma : promotion or back wages for an employee cannot be denied when employee not terminated from service due to misconduct

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Exit mobile version