Follow:
- Next story *k selvaraj law notes 29.3.’21, LAW NOTES :* *RELATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT ENTRIES IN THE SAME LIST* *(1)* Every attempt should be made to harmonize the different entries in the same list and to discard a construction which will render any of the entries nugatory or ineffective. [AIR 1962 SC 1044] Calcutta Gas Co. Vs. St. of W.B. *(2)* As between entries in the same list, the general scheme followed is that each particular entry should relate to a separate subject or group of cognate subjects. But the different entries are supplemenntary to each other. [AIR 1961 SC 1170] J.K Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Vs. St. of U.P.
- Previous story Lordship.mahadevan super speech in mylapore vallalar function
Recent Posts
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
- கிறிஸ்துவ மத போதகர் ஜாமீன் கோரி
More
Recent Posts
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
- கிறிஸ்துவ மத போதகர் ஜாமீன் கோரி
