Mhc adv vinoth pandian law tips
[2/28, 14:05] Vinothpandian: 2021 (4) CTC 241 ( FB) : narayanan MV vs periyadan narayanan nair : single judge cannot doubt correctness of division bench decision
[2/28, 14:05] Vinothpandian: 2014 (6) 577 : duro flex pvt ltd vs duroflex sittings system ( FB ) : Principle of forum conveniens though not applicable to civil proceedings have role to play in so far as consideration of grant of leave or revocation of leave under clause 12 of letters patent is concerned
[2/28, 14:05] Vinothpandian: 2013 (3) CPJ 294 : shriram transport finance co ltd vs jaspal singh , Ranjeet singh : In an hire purchase agreement , financier is real owner of vehicle and person who take loan retains vehicle only as bailee / trustee
[3/1, 19:12] Vinothpandian: 1980 (3) SCC 29 : NC singhal vs union of india : mere expression of opinion cannot create an estoppel
[3/1, 19:12] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) CTC 914 : Goomo orbit corporate & leisure travels pvt ltd vs GI retail pvt ltd : In a plaint , party relying on misrepresentation , fraud , breach of trust wilful.default or any undue influence must plead all particulars including dates and items in a suit for defamation.
[3/1, 19:12] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) All india criminal LR SC 96 : state of punjab vs madan mohan lal.verma : mere recovery of tainted money is not sufficient to convict the accused when substantive evidence in case is not reliable , unless there is evidence to prove payment of bribe or to show that the money was taken voluntarily as a bribe , mere reciept of amount by accused is not sufficient to fasten guilt in absence of any evidence with regard to demand and acceptance of the amount as illegal gratification
[3/1, 19:12] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) SCC 520 : Anita malhotra vs Apparel export promotion council : certified copy of a annual return of a company is a public document ( section 74 evidence act 1872 )
[3/1, 19:12] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) DRTC 801 : sterlite technologies ltd vs union of india : Elements of a prima facie case and question of financial hardship required to be considered by appellate tribunal while deciding on waiver application ( sec 21 RDDBFI act 1993 )
[3/1, 19:12] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) crimes 141 : state of orissa vs ujjal kumar burdhan : unless a case of gross abuse of power is made out against those incharge of investigation , high court should avoid interfering at a prematured or preliminary stage of investigation.
[3/1, 19:12] Vinothpandian: 2005 (6) SCC 109 : Rajendra sail vs madhya pradesh high court bar association : Judgements of courts are public documents and can be commented upon , analysed and criticized but it has to be in dignified manner without attributing motives
[3/2, 16:46] Vinothpandian: 2011 (1) RCR ( criminal ) 197 SC : Ramdeo chauhan @ Rajnath chauhan vs Rani kant das : death sentence awarded to accused , national human rights commission has jurisdiction to make recommendations be governor to commute the sentence
[3/2, 16:46] Vinothpandian: 2006 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 261 SC : mayuram subramanian srinivsan vs CBI : ” incuria ” literally means carelessness , in practice per incuriam is taken to mean per ignoratium , to perpetuate an error is no heroism , to rectify it is the compulsion of the judicial conscience
[3/2, 16:46] Vinothpandian: 2019 (8) SCC 27 : vishnu kumar tiwari vs state of uttar pradesh : Sec 173 ( 2) CRPC : If protest petition fulfills requirements of complaint , magistrate may treat it as complaint under sec 200 read with 202 CRPC
[3/2, 16:46] Vinothpandian: 2011 (8) SCC 161 : Indian council for enviro – legal action vs union of india : judgements delivered by supreme court in exercise of jurisdiction under article 136 cannot be reopened in a writ petition under article 32 of the constitution of india
[3/2, 16:46] Vinothpandian: 2010 ( 8) SLT 74 : mohd sand vs shaik mahfooz : Apex court ordinarily does not interfere with interlocutory orders under article 136 of the constitution